Re: Some problems with automake/autoconf

2002-10-25 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:15:29AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:50:29PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I am having a problem with one of my packages failing on s390. It > > builds fine on other architectures (except where I messed up with a bad > > bu

Re: Some problems with automake/autoconf

2002-10-25 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:15:29AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:50:29PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I am having a problem with one of my packages failing on s390. It > > builds fine on other architectures (except where I messed up with a bad > > bu

Re: Some problems with automake/autoconf

2002-10-24 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Drew Parsons said: > Why do you have to specify host like that? The whole point of using > configure is so you don't have to do that, configure determines it > automatically, not so? > > Drew I'm sorry, I was less clear than I could have been - I've been banging on t

Re: Some problems with automake/autoconf

2002-10-24 Thread Eric Dorland
Try updating your config.sub and config.guess from autotools-dev. * Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello all, > > I am having a problem with one of my packages failing on s390. It > builds fine on other architectures (except where I messed up with a bad > build-depends on a build-esse

Re: Some problems with automake/autoconf

2002-10-24 Thread Drew Parsons
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:50:29PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > Hello all, > > I am having a problem with one of my packages failing on s390. It > builds fine on other architectures (except where I messed up with a bad > build-depends on a build-essential). The problem with s390 is here: > > #

Re: Some problems with automake/autoconf

2002-10-24 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Drew Parsons said: > Why do you have to specify host like that? The whole point of using > configure is so you don't have to do that, configure determines it > automatically, not so? > > Drew I'm sorry, I was less clear than I could have been - I've been banging on t

Re: Some problems with automake/autoconf

2002-10-24 Thread Eric Dorland
--ncSAzJYg3Aa9+CRW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Try updating your config.sub and config.guess from autotools-dev. * Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello all, >=20 > I am having a problem with one of

Re: Some problems with automake/autoconf

2002-10-24 Thread Drew Parsons
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:50:29PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > Hello all, > > I am having a problem with one of my packages failing on s390. It > builds fine on other architectures (except where I messed up with a bad > build-depends on a build-essential). The problem with s390 is here: > > #

Some problems with automake/autoconf

2002-10-24 Thread Stephen Gran
Hello all, I am having a problem with one of my packages failing on s390. It builds fine on other architectures (except where I messed up with a bad build-depends on a build-essential). The problem with s390 is here: # Add here commands to configure the package. ./configure --host=s390-linux --

Some problems with automake/autoconf

2002-10-24 Thread Stephen Gran
Hello all, I am having a problem with one of my packages failing on s390. It builds fine on other architectures (except where I messed up with a bad build-depends on a build-essential). The problem with s390 is here: # Add here commands to configure the package. ./configure --host=s390-linux --