On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 10:06:28AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> PS: Has somebody talked with the XEphem author to make it DFSG-free? What's
> wrong with us in natural sciences? Why are we so infected by this "noone
> will steal my work" metality? Why do we tend to write such stupid
> "RBK" == Richard B Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RBK> However, such a
RBK> server is probably not very attractive to package since there
RBK> are fast and reliable servers for such things on the net
RBK> (like the above) and XEphem is the only program using it at
RB
First, thanks for all the comments.
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 09:23:12PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
>
> > I am about to build some packages of astronomical databases to be used
> > with Elwood Downey's XEphem, packaged by Frank Jordan for slin
On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 09:23:12PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> I am about to build some packages of astronomical databases to be used
> with Elwood Downey's XEphem, packaged by Frank Jordan for slink. Since
> some of these databases are quite large I would like to hear what people
> think a
On Thursday 14 January 1999, at 13 h 16, the keyboard of Darren Benham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Id say, package it and put it into a seperate directory.. either a "non-cd"
> directory or a directory that could later become a "data set cd" file. We've
> got other large data sets that could be
Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> I am about to build some packages of astronomical databases to be used
> with Elwood Downey's XEphem, packaged by Frank Jordan for slink. Since
> some of these databases are quite large I would like to hear what people
> think about a possible split-up. The packages will
On 14-Jan-99 Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> I am about to build some packages of astronomical databases to be used
> with Elwood Downey's XEphem, packaged by Frank Jordan for slink. Since
> some of these databases are quite large I would like to hear what people
> think about a possible split-up. The
> To wrap things up, there are 5 options:
> a) 160M GSC + 8.7M asteroids + 4.3M PPM + 4.1M others
> b) 160M GSC + 8.7M asteroids + 8.4M PPM and others<-- nice
> c) 160M GSC + 17.1M other catalogs
> d) 4.3M PPM + 4.1M others
> e) 8.4M PPM and others
> of which I prefer the sec
Hi;
I am about to build some packages of astronomical databases to be used
with Elwood Downey's XEphem, packaged by Frank Jordan for slink. Since
some of these databases are quite large I would like to hear what people
think about a possible split-up. The packages will be part of non-free,
the mai
9 matches
Mail list logo
