https://github.com/redis/hiredis/issues/327 -- sounds like upstream's
on-board. Thanks for your help Andrey!
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:43:57PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> > After reading a little more about shared lib naming & SONAME, I th
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:43:57PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> After reading a little more about shared lib naming & SONAME, I think I
> understand. So instead of the current libhiredis.so.0 symlink we want a
> libhiredis.so.0.13 symlink & the "real name" of the shared lib would be
> something like lib
Just wanted to upload a straw man example of what I'm talking about:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hiredis/hiredis_0.13.1-1.dsc
And the result of installing this package over the top of an existing
libhiredis0.10 install:
https://gist.github.com/thomaslee/c97582fd4a7ba80f9abf
Che
Hey Andrey, thanks for the advice:
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:09:10PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> > By and large that's an easy & mostly mechanical change, but both
> > libhiredis0.10 and libhiredis0.13 want to install the libhiredis.so.0
>
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:09:10PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> By and large that's an easy & mostly mechanical change, but both
> libhiredis0.10 and libhiredis0.13 want to install the libhiredis.so.0
> symlink (each pointing to one of libhiredis.so.0.{10,13}).
From the upstream perspective this looks l
Silly question, but I need a quick sanity-check:
hiredis upstream has bumped their SONAME from 0.10 to 0.13. From what I
understand, this means the libhiredis0.10 binary package needs to be
renamed to libhiredis0.13.
By and large that's an easy & mostly mechanical change, but both
libhiredis0.10
6 matches
Mail list logo