Re: Separate gpg signing from package building

2014-07-14 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:59 PM, T o n g wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to separate gpg signing from package building? > > As I'm still trying to learn Debian package building, I've found myself > fallen into this silly loop many times -- Thinking that the package

Re: Separate gpg signing from package building

2014-07-14 Thread The Wanderer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/14/2014 12:56 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:31 PM, The Wanderer wrote: >> I don't remember reading an explanation of how to do this in the >> New Maintainers' Guide or similar documentation, and I don't see an >> obvious w

Re: Separate gpg signing from package building

2014-07-14 Thread Alexander Alemayhu
file): debuild -i -us -uc -b" from man debuild. 2014-07-14 5:59 GMT+02:00 T o n g : > Hi, > > Is it possible to separate gpg signing from package building? > > As I'm still trying to learn Debian package building, I've found myself > fallen into this sill

Re: Separate gpg signing from package building

2014-07-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > Appears I was wrong about maint-guide mentioning debsign, but it > mentions how to build without signing: I was wrong again, it does mention debsign: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/build.en.html#pbuilder -- bye, pabs https:/

Re: Separate gpg signing from package building

2014-07-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:31 PM, The Wanderer wrote: > I could be wrong, but I understood the question as being not how to > build without signing, but how to sign after building, without having to > rebuild. I.e., always build without signing, then sign as a separate > step once a build has prov

Re: Separate gpg signing from package building

2014-07-13 Thread The Wanderer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/14/2014 12:26 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:59 AM, T o n g wrote: >> Now I'm thinking, wouldn't it be nice I always build the package >> without gpg signing, and when finally I tested everything working >> fine, I sign it.

Re: Separate gpg signing from package building

2014-07-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:59 AM, T o n g wrote: > Is it possible to separate gpg signing from package building? Yes and it is planned to make that the default: https://bugs.debian.org/733029 > Now I'm thinking, wouldn't it be nice I always build the package without > gp

Separate gpg signing from package building

2014-07-13 Thread T o n g
Hi, Is it possible to separate gpg signing from package building? As I'm still trying to learn Debian package building, I've found myself fallen into this silly loop many times -- Thinking that the package would be fine, I build it with gpg signing, but only to find out minutes lat