On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, T o n g wrote:
> - the latest standard of debian/rules file
THere is none. You can use dh ..., you can use the dh_* calls
directly, you can use cdbs, ...
I myself have packages with all kind of formats.
If it works out, using debhelper with dh is nice, but if you have
to star
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:30 PM, T o n g wrote:
> If we can influence upstream, why don't we get their structure right at
> the first place? If Debian can't influence it, then I believe no other
> distro on earth can influence it. I mean, nowadays Debian is so powerful
> and the line between upst
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:53:59 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> - the most simplified Makefile
>
> This is upstream stuff not Debian stuff...
> Ultimately you should have no patches because ...
If we can influence upstream, why don't we get their structure right at
the first place? If Debian can't in
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:30 AM, T o n g wrote:
> Is there a *simple* sample Debian package somewhere out there that show-
> case most of the important Debian packaging aspects?
I think you want to look at the hello package.
> E.g., with a small C/C++ file, the sample package shows
>
> - the l
T o n g writes:
> Is there a *simple* sample Debian package somewhere out there that show-
> case most of the important Debian packaging aspects?
> E.g., with a small C/C++ file, the sample package shows
> - the latest standard of debian/rules file
> - the most simplified Makefile
> - how to
Hi,
Is there a *simple* sample Debian package somewhere out there that show-
case most of the important Debian packaging aspects?
E.g., with a small C/C++ file, the sample package shows
- the latest standard of debian/rules file
- the most simplified Makefile
- how to build from ./configure
-
6 matches
Mail list logo
