Re: SONAME vs illegal package name

2008-01-19 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 14:58 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm packaging OpenVAS and have the following problem. The upstream > > package for the component I am working on is called openvas-libraries, > > so I was initially going to package it as libopenv

Re: SONAME vs illegal package name

2008-01-17 Thread Russ Allbery
Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm packaging OpenVAS and have the following problem. The upstream > package for the component I am working on is called openvas-libraries, > so I was initially going to package it as libopenvas. However, it > contains two libraries, libopenvas and libopen

Re: SONAME vs illegal package name

2008-01-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 17/01/2008, Tim Brown wrote: > two libraries, libopenvas and libopenvas_hg and I was getting > complaints that libopenvas didn't match the SONAME (for > libopenvas_hg.so) FWIW, it is thought about removing this lintian check (I had a quick discussion with Russ Allbery in #459851[1]). 1. http:

SONAME vs illegal package name

2008-01-17 Thread Tim Brown
Hi, I'm packaging OpenVAS and have the following problem. The upstream package for the component I am working on is called openvas-libraries, so I was initially going to package it as libopenvas. However, it contains two libraries, libopenvas and libopenvas_hg and I was getting complaints tha