Re: Request For a Review: python-mpd2/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

Hi, First, thank for the review Fernando :) I did forget to mention I recently adopt python-mpd, #612909 [0]. I also have to clarify that I only post an ITP for python-mpd2. This thread is only a request for *review* (not a RFS), I do not intend to ask for a sponsored upload in the near future

Re: Request For a Review: python-mpd2/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

Hi, On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Geoffroy Youri Berret wrote: > Le 20/03/2012 17:00, Jakub Wilk a écrit : >> Your Replaces is versioned but Conflicts is not. This is awkward. >> What has changed in python-mpd 0.3.0 that Replaces is not needed >> anymore? >> >> Is the conflict with python-mpd

Re: Request For a Review: python-mpd2/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

Hi, Thanks for the review Jakub :) Le 20/03/2012 17:00, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > * Geoffroy Youri Berret , 2012-03-20, 15:50: >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-mpd2/python-mpd2_0.4.0-1.dsc I did paste the wrong link :/ http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-mpd2/p

Re: Request For a Review: python-mpd2/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

* Geoffroy Youri Berret , 2012-03-20, 15:50: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-mpd2/python-mpd2_0.4.0-1.dsc You wrote "debhelper (>= 9.0.0)" but debhelper doesn't use such versioning scheme anymore. I'd use plain "debhelper (>= 9)". python-all is needed in the clean tar

Request For a Review: python-mpd2/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

Hi, I've started working on packaging python-mpd2 which is a fork of python-mpd [0]. I've mainly followed the guide on the wiki [1]. * Package name: python-mpd2 Version : 0.4.1-1 Upstream Author : Jörg Thalheim * URL : https://github.com/Mic92/python-mpd2 * License