Re: Replaces: and pre/post rm

2001-06-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:13:53AM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > Ah, very good point. Why not simply add in the purge section a block > > around it which says: > > > > if ! [ -f > packages> ] > > then > > delete a lot of files > > fi > > Because I have to allow for the user switching fr

Re: Replaces: and pre/post rm

2001-06-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:13:53AM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > Ah, very good point. Why not simply add in the purge section a block > > around it which says: > > > > if ! [ -f ] > > then > > delete a lot of files > > fi > > Because I have to allow for the user switching from non-tls

Re: Replaces: and pre/post rm

2001-06-15 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 04:29:30PM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > So was the actually called with the purge > > option? It doesn't appear to have done. > > Not that I can find Good. > Since both packages must have the same postrm, and they rem

Re: Replaces: and pre/post rm

2001-06-15 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 04:29:30PM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > So was the actually called with the purge > > option? It doesn't appear to have done. > > Not that I can find Good. > Since both packages must have the same postrm, and they re

Re: Replaces: and pre/post rm

2001-06-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:42:08PM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > > The problem comes when the user replaces the non-ssl with the ssl > > > version (or visa versa): the postrm script on the replaced version > > > is apparently called with the PURGE option. > > [...] > No, must've been hallucin

Re: Replaces: and pre/post rm

2001-06-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:42:08PM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > > The problem comes when the user replaces the non-ssl with the ssl > > > version (or visa versa): the postrm script on the replaced version > > > is apparently called with the PURGE option. > > [...] > No, must've been halluci

Re: Replaces: and pre/post rm

2001-06-13 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:27:21AM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > Until the crypto in main stuff settles down, I'm setting up sendmail to > build either SSL or non-SSL... All that works fine... > > The problem comes when the user replaces the non-ssl with the ssl > version (or visa versa):

Re: Replaces: and pre/post rm

2001-06-13 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:27:21AM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > Until the crypto in main stuff settles down, I'm setting up sendmail to > build either SSL or non-SSL... All that works fine... > > The problem comes when the user replaces the non-ssl with the ssl > version (or visa versa):