On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:13:13PM +0530, Viral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package, vcdimager, which doesn't build on the arm architecture,
> because of the way gcc handles bitfields on arm.
>
> It is non-trivial to fix this problem right away, so I would like to know
> what is a good thing to do
Hi,
I have a package, vcdimager, which doesn't build on the arm architecture,
because of the way gcc handles bitfields on arm.
It is non-trivial to fix this problem right away, so I would like to know
what is a good thing to do.
Is it ok, to put the rest of the architectures in the Architecture
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:13:13PM +0530, Viral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package, vcdimager, which doesn't build on the arm architecture,
> because of the way gcc handles bitfields on arm.
>
> It is non-trivial to fix this problem right away, so I would like to know
> what is a good thing to d
Hi,
I have a package, vcdimager, which doesn't build on the arm architecture,
because of the way gcc handles bitfields on arm.
It is non-trivial to fix this problem right away, so I would like to know
what is a good thing to do.
Is it ok, to put the rest of the architectures in the Architectur
4 matches
Mail list logo
