"Russ Allbery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wrt/ lintian, as long as the packages do work, the purely optional
matter of style questions[0] should never be part of any lintian check
(lintian shall only check for policy
Russ Allbery wrote:
> In other words, feel free to submit a wishlist lintian bug for things like
> this. I'm going to pull up all of those once the style check facility is
> available.
cool, didn't know about that intention. thanks for telling.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrass
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2007-01-01, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I guess not since this is not defined in the policy. Maybe=20
>> if Homepage becomes a real control field.
>>
>
> with two spaces it is formatted on the web like this:
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/kde/y
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> wrt/ lintian, as long as the packages do work, the purely optional
> matter of style questions[0] should never be part of any lintian check
> (lintian shall only check for policy violations or general package
> breakages). That is why I never would have
"Paul Cager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The policy *does* distinguish between lines starting with one space
> (paragraphs with word-wrapping) and lines starting with two or more spaces
> (non-wrapped if panning is possible, otherwise hard-wrapped), so I think
> there is a strong policy basis for
Hi,
* Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-01 16:13]:
> > Hi,
> > * Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-01 14:13]:
> >> After watching debian-mentors@ for a some time, I've found two types
> >> of suggestions frequenly advised to the packagers:
> >>
> >> * Removing empty lines from the
> Hi,
> * Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-01 14:13]:
>> After watching debian-mentors@ for a some time, I've found two types
>> of suggestions frequenly advised to the packagers:
>>
>> * Removing empty lines from the end of debian/copyright,
>> debian/changelog
>>
>> * Using two spac
Neil Williams wrote:
> Daniel: would you agree?
Let's get this once and for all clear:
Given that lintian, as any automatic tool, can not catch all flaws in
every case, manuall listing of the remaining flaws is always needed, I
don't really care about if I need to point these flaws out in additio
Hi,
* Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-01 15:04]:
> On 2007-01-01, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I guess not since this is not defined in the policy. Maybe=20
> > if Homepage becomes a real control field.
>
> with two spaces it is formatted on the web like this:
> http://packa
On 2007-01-01, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess not since this is not defined in the policy. Maybe=20
> if Homepage becomes a real control field.
with two spaces it is formatted on the web like this:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/kde/yakuake
with one space like this:
http://p
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 19:01:47 +0600
Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After watching debian-mentors@ for a some time, I've found two types
> of suggestions frequenly advised to the packagers:
>
> * Removing empty lines from the end of debian/copyright,
> debian/changelog
>
> *
Hi,
* Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-01 14:13]:
> After watching debian-mentors@ for a some time, I've found two types
> of suggestions frequenly advised to the packagers:
>
> * Removing empty lines from the end of debian/copyright,
> debian/changelog
>
> * Using two spaces before
Hi,
After watching debian-mentors@ for a some time, I've found two types
of suggestions frequenly advised to the packagers:
* Removing empty lines from the end of debian/copyright,
debian/changelog
* Using two spaces before 'Homepage:' field in package description.
Do they look like candidate
13 matches
Mail list logo
