Hi Hilmar,
Thanks very much, I have submitted a bug report.
Aaron
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:43 AM Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
> On 20.03.2023 16:38, Aaron Boxer wrote:
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> are you subscribed to debian-devel-annou...@lists.debian.org ?
>
> > Thanks, Santiago. How do I contact the release
On 20.03.2023 16:38, Aaron Boxer wrote:
Hi Aaron,
are you subscribed to debian-devel-annou...@lists.debian.org ?
Thanks, Santiago. How do I contact the release team to ask about unblock ?
"According to schedule, we have frozen bookworm a bit more
(2023-03-12). This means that we are one step
Thanks, Santiago. How do I contact the release team to ask about unblock ?
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:17 AM Santiago Ruano Rincón <
santiag...@riseup.net> wrote:
> El 20/03/23 a las 11:08, Aaron Boxer escribió:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I have successfully created a patched version of libgrokj2k to f
El 20/03/23 a las 11:08, Aaron Boxer escribió:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have successfully created a patched version of libgrokj2k to fix a serious
> encoder bug.
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libgrokj2k/
Without looking at the bug itself, I'd file an RC bug to keep a record
about why you are t
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 03:41:48PM +, Popout3D wrote:
> So it looks like I've got all the possible files I might need. The command is
> dput .changes which doesn't specify source/binary, so how do I ensure
> that dput uploads the source package?
.changes specifies what files will be uploaded,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:00 AM Popout3D - popou...@yahoo.com wrote:
> ... I need to upload a source package.
>
> . . . The command is dput
> .changes which doesn't specify source/binary, so how do I ensure that
> dput uploads the source package?
build the source, then dput the .changes of the
Hi!!
El 27/10/18 a les 03:11, Paul Wise ha escrit:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:33 PM Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
>
>> I have an strange doubt. One of the package I maintain is a library (ompl)
>> and
>> now I would like to push a new version with new ABI.
>
> It sounds like you are upstrea
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:33 PM Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> I have an strange doubt. One of the package I maintain is a library (ompl) and
> now I would like to push a new version with new ABI.
It sounds like you are upstream for this library?
Either way you might want to use abipkgdiff (
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Sascha Manns wrote:
> Now i have fixed these things, and built a new package version. Should
> i delete the old package before uploading the new package version?
IIRC, reuploading will replace the older version.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Hello list,
i have uploaded a package some weeks ago to mentors.debian.net, which
was reviewed by a Sponsor. He mentioned some things to fix before
uploading to the official archive.
Now i have fixed these things, and built a new package version. Should
i delete the old package before uploading t
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:56:58AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> but need help with actually
> uploading the fix. Is there anyone out there which could give me a hand?
Several people here can help you out, but the process of asking for
sponsorship here is done by filing a RFS (Request For Sponsorshi
* Osamu Aoki , 2014-04-23, 23:55:
If the package "foo" depends on the package "libbar-dev" and
"libbar-dev" is in new queue waiting for approval, can I upload the
package "foo" build on the sid chroot with the package "libbar-dev"
manually installed to it?
Or I should wait the package "libbar
Hi,
> if also possible upload this one. It removes a obsolete dependency
> git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-xmpp/jabber-muc.git
Let's see:
-Recommends: jabberd14 | jabberd2
+Recommends: jabberd2
I do not think that such small change requires upload.
Small note: I have fixed tiny typo in debian/copy
Hi Elena,
thank you for your answer. Yes you are right, I had typo and hence it
uploads to main archive.
Matus Valo
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' <
elena.valha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2014-01-07 at 10:11:50 +0100, matus valo wrote:
> > I haven't found documentation a
On 2014-01-07 at 10:11:50 +0100, matus valo wrote:
> I haven't found documentation about procedure how to upload new version of
> package to mentors.debian.net. So I tried to upload it the same way as I
> uploaded original version. Nothing happened.
dput creates a $PKG.$ARCHIVE.upload file to pre
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 04:38:28PM +0200, Ross Gammon wrote:
> I have tried signing the the changes file with debsign "debsign
> foopackage.changes", but I assume this is just like the signing that
> the standard dpkg-buildpackage does?
Personally, I use debsign -k to ensure that
my package is s
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 16:38:28 +0200,
Ross Gammon wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I have been googling this for a while now. Lots of people have
>problems with their keys, but not quite my problem!
>
>I have created a package with "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc" because my
>key is not yet (but almost) signed by someo
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> I want to get roxterm 1.20.x into Debian but there's 1.18.5-3 in testing
> waiting for Squeeze's release. Should 1.20.x go into experimental
> instead of unstable? If so do I do this just by putting "experimental"
> instead of "unstable" in d
On Saturday, October 23, 2010 08:21:23 you wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:49:41PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> There's no reason Debian freezes must last six months or longer.
>
>Are you serious?
Yes.
>There is nothing in our real life which have no reason to be that way.
>It takes
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:49:41PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
...
> >"Only" during a freeze ends up meaning "six months or longer". You
> >think that's a short time? It's one full Ubuntu release cycle!
>
> There's no reason Debian freezes must last six months or longer. Still, even
Hi!
Am 13.10.2010 16:05, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl:
Why do fixes to testing have to go through unstable, even during freeze
time?
>>> Because a lot more people use Unstable than use Testing
>> Citation needed.
> Looking at http://popcon.debian.org/ , I see 21548 reports for the
Hi!
Am 13.10.2010 15:11, schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 11/10/10 at 09:14 -0700, PJ Weisberg wrote:
>> 2010/10/11 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso :
>>> Why do fixes to testing have to go through unstable, even during freeze
>>> time?
>> Because a lot more people use Unstable than use Testing
> Citation nee
On 11/10/10 at 09:14 -0700, PJ Weisberg wrote:
> 2010/10/11 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso :
> > Why do fixes to testing have to go through unstable, even during freeze
> > time?
>
> Because a lot more people use Unstable than use Testing
Citation needed.
- Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
In , Jordi
Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>I just realised, the packages I'm complaining about are essentially
>squeeze backports. That is, they're packages that the packager wishes
>could have gone into squeeze but can't because of the freeze, so they
>go into experimental instead.
>
>Would it make sen
Firstly, this discussion is extremely off-topic on debian-mentors,
debian-project would have been a better choice.
2010/10/12 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso :
> Now, experimental by default is pinned to lowest priority, and in the
> meantime, during the freeze, your friendly packager is still waiting
>
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:44:51 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> I just realised, the packages I'm complaining about are essentially
> squeeze backports. That is, they're packages that the packager wishes
> could have gone into squeeze but can't because of the freeze, so they
> go into experime
Il giorno mar, 12/10/2010 alle 13.59 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso ha
scritto:
> 2010/10/12 Pietro Battiston :
> > But before this conversation goes on forever - which is tipically what
> > happens when people think they are debating on methods and techniques
> > while instead they diverge on moti
I just realised, the packages I'm complaining about are essentially
squeeze backports. That is, they're packages that the packager wishes
could have gone into squeeze but can't because of the freeze, so they
go into experimental instead.
Would it make sense then to start $x-backports as soon as $x
2010/10/12 Pietro Battiston :
> But before this conversation goes on forever - which is tipically what
> happens when people think they are debating on methods and techniques
> while instead they diverge on motivations - does the following satisfy
> you:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/406301/
> http:/
On 12 October 2010 09:24, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
[standard response without actually reading what is being replied to]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.
Il giorno mar, 12/10/2010 alle 08.55 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso ha
scritto:
> On 11 October 2010 19:02, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
> >
>
> >> The *real* problem is that labelling Firefox 3.6 as "experimental" is
> >> downright silly.
> >
> > Hm, okay. I guess I'
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:55:11 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 11 October 2010 19:02, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
> >
>
> >> The *real* problem is that labelling Firefox 3.6 as "experimental" is
> >> downright silly.
> >
> > Hm, okay. I guess I'm not feeling
Hi,
Le 12/10/10 15:55, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso a écrit :
[standard rambling about how freeze slows down unstable development]
I know it's pretty useless to participate in this sort of conversation,
but conversation is not about being useful, right?
> unstable again is again used as it should be
On 11 October 2010 19:02, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
>
>> The *real* problem is that labelling Firefox 3.6 as "experimental" is
>> downright silly.
>
> Hm, okay. I guess I'm not feeling particularly inspired to do any work
> based on that reaction.
Sorry if I'm frust
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
* Firefox 3.6 has faster JavaScript, which is the difference between this
page being usable, and it not: http://openhatch.org/people/. (Admittedly
that's a site under my control, so I can improve it;
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> * Firefox 3.6 has faster JavaScript, which is the difference between this
> page being usable, and it not: http://openhatch.org/people/. (Admittedly
> that's a site under my control, so I can improve it; but there are surely
> other such p
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
I guess so, although I don't personally even use unstable myself for the
aforementioned reasons. However, unstable is used as the "desktop"
version of Debian by a large number of users, and the awkward
development it get
On Monday, October 11, 2010 17:01:16 you wrote:
>On 11 October 2010 20:28, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
>> In , Jordi
>> Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>>>On 11 October 2010 12:11, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
>>>wrote:
It gets used as "unstable+1" during the freeze, since there's no better
plac
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
> I guess so, although I don't personally even use unstable myself for the
> aforementioned reasons. However, unstable is used as the "desktop"
> version of Debian by a large number of users, and the awkward
> development it gets during freeze time is not really fi
.On 12 October 2010 01:02, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Oh, so the specific problem that you're trying to fix is that you, as an
> unstable user, aren't getting software that you would like to be using
> because unstable is being used for a different purpose during the freeze?
I guess so, although I d
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
> So the promises implied by the spectrum of answers to "do you want it
> new, xor do you want it stable?" gets broken during freeze time because
> the usual place to upload untested software is occupied by the freeze
> cycle.
Oh, so the specific problem that you'
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 11 October 2010 20:28, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In , Jordi
Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 11 October 2010 12:11, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
It gets used as "unstable+1" during the freeze, since there's no better
place.
So why n
On 11 October 2010 20:01, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
>> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
>>> It gets used as "unstable+1" during the freeze, since there's no better
>>> place.
>
>> So why not create a better place?
>
> What specifically is wrong with experimental? In o
On 11 October 2010 20:28, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In , Jordi
> Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>>On 11 October 2010 12:11, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> wrote:
>>> It gets used as "unstable+1" during the freeze, since there's no better
>>> place.
>>
>>So why not create a better place?
>
> Because of
In , Jordi
Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>On 11 October 2010 12:11, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
>>> In , Jordi
>>> Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>>>Does it have to be this way? Why do fixes to testing have to go
>>>through unstable, even during freeze time?
>>>
>> They don't. t-p-u exists for when the
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> It gets used as "unstable+1" during the freeze, since there's no better
>> place.
> So why not create a better place?
What specifically is wrong with experimental? In other words, what
problem are you trying to fix other than
On 11 October 2010 12:11, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I disagree that *any* package based on a new upstream release is *known* to be
> less buggy than the existing package,
Good, so do I, but in this case, cppcheck is a very infrequently used
Debian package, and it's used widely by other peop
In , Jordi
Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>On 7 October 2010 14:06, Joachim Reichel wrote:
>> I guess what Christoph meant is the following: if you upload 1.45 to
>> unstable you block this way for fixes to 1.44 in testing (and the RM will
>> most probably not allow 1.45 to migrate to testing).
>>
>>
2010/10/11 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso :
> Why do fixes to testing have to go through unstable, even during freeze time?
Because a lot more people use Unstable than use Testing, so
(ironically) Unstable is a better place to do testing.
> Why does experimental become the new unstable during freeze tim
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
> Does it have to be this way? Why do fixes to testing have to go
> through unstable, even during freeze time?
Because otherwise there isn't any good way to test them with a reasonably
large user base, which is even *more* important during the freeze.
--
Russ Al
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 07:23:19PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> I changed something in my packages and want to upload them again. But it
> says:
>
> $ sudo dupload -t mentors whysynth_20080412-1_i386.changes
> whysynth_20080412-1_i386.changes ok, already done for mentors ]
> Nothing to uploa
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Are there any problem in uploading packages built inside that chroot?
It should be fine. In fact that is a recommended practice. It
prevents flavor from the developer's machine leaking into the build.
The 'pbuilder' package is very nice for managing these types of
chr
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 19:56 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> So, you are worried.
> Worried about not being i386 enough.
>
> I say: Screw i386 !
Fine to say that, but Ubuntu is screaming ahead of Debian
here -- they actually support amd64, Debian doesn't.
--
John Skaller
Download Felix: http:
On 08/07/05, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The machine I used to create debian packages ceased to work last week.
> The only machine I have ATM to do debian work is an amd64 box with the
> "unofficial" port of debian. I've set up an ia32 chroot in which I set
> up an i386 debian u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07.07.2005, at 22:08, Justin Pryzby wrote:
I was also wondering, can't you just use a .d.o machine to compile the
package, uploading also to some other .d.o machine (incoming, or
ftp-master, or whatever it might be).
You could not compile most o
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:03:02PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07.07.2005, at 19:56, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >If you have a non ia32 system, then show that and be proud of it.
>
> Well at least it should not be possible to upload amd64 binar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07.07.2005, at 19:56, Geert Stappers wrote:
If you have a non ia32 system, then show that and be proud of it.
Well at least it should not be possible to upload amd64 binary
packages to the main Debian incoming as the port is unknown to katie.
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:58:15PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The machine I used to create debian packages ceased to work last week.
> The only machine I have ATM to do debian work is an amd64 box with the
> "unofficial" port of debian. I've set up an ia32 chroot in which I set
> up an i386
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 08:22:02AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> I am currently preparing packages for rrfw, a network statistics tool like
> mrtg and cricket but much more flexible. rrfw needs a whole bunch of perl
> packages that are not even in unstable, so these packages need to go into
> Debian
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 08:22:02AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> I am currently preparing packages for rrfw, a network statistics tool like
> mrtg and cricket but much more flexible. rrfw needs a whole bunch of perl
> packages that are not even in unstable, so these packages need to go into
> Debian
-- Initial Header ---
>From : Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To : debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Cc :
Date : Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:53:19 +0100
Subject : Re: uploading to stable
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 08:31:35PM +0100, Sebastien
C
-- Initial Header ---
>From : Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc :
Date : Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:53:19 +0100
Subject : Re: uploading to stable
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 08:31:35PM +0100, Sebastien
Chaumat wrote:
&g
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 08:31:35PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> Le dim 22/12/2002 à 19:40, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 07:13:40PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
> >
> > > My package in stable and testing is in version 2.1.
> > > In unstable it is version 3
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 08:31:35PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> Le dim 22/12/2002 à 19:40, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 07:13:40PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
> >
> > > My package in stable and testing is in version 2.1.
> > > In unstable it is version 3
Hi,
Le dim 22/12/2002 à 19:40, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 07:13:40PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
>
> > My package in stable and testing is in version 2.1.
> > In unstable it is version 3.0-1.
> > 3.0-2 is already in the pool for unstable.
>
> > I need to upload a pack
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 07:13:40PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
> My package in stable and testing is in version 2.1.
> In unstable it is version 3.0-1.
> 3.0-2 is already in the pool for unstable.
> I need to upload a package vith version >=3.0 to stable-proposed-update.
> Which version shoul
Hi,
Le dim 22/12/2002 à 19:40, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 07:13:40PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
>
> > My package in stable and testing is in version 2.1.
> > In unstable it is version 3.0-1.
> > 3.0-2 is already in the pool for unstable.
>
> > I need to upload a pack
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 07:13:40PM +0100, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
> My package in stable and testing is in version 2.1.
> In unstable it is version 3.0-1.
> 3.0-2 is already in the pool for unstable.
> I need to upload a package vith version >=3.0 to stable-proposed-update.
> Which version shoul
Me:
> Did I misunderstand something, or is the keyring server down?
D'uh! GnuPG doesn't like my proxy. If I disable the proxy, it works just
fine.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter
Me:
> Did I misunderstand something, or is the keyring server down?
D'uh! GnuPG doesn't like my proxy. If I disable the proxy, it works just
fine.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/pete
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:38:00PM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
> I've got it! I did good debian package. It is tested with lintian,
> and my debian developers friends. I've got files:
[...]
> How to upload this files to debian? Can I only put this files onto
> ftp-master.debian.org? Please - he
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:38:00PM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
> I've got it! I did good debian package. It is tested with lintian,
> and my debian developers friends. I've got files:
[...]
> How to upload this files to debian? Can I only put this files onto
> ftp-master.debian.org? Please - h
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:45:55PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> One of my packages (ibrazilian & brazilian-conjugate), as in stable currently,
> is buggy. The version in unstable gracefully fixes them, while it doesn't
> include any new features (it's a new upstream version, but t
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:45:55PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> One of my packages (ibrazilian & brazilian-conjugate), as in stable currently,
> is buggy. The version in unstable gracefully fixes them, while it doesn't
> include any new features (it's a new upstream version, but
Decklin Foster wrote:
> However, I soon discovered that gzip apparenly creates different
> compressed files for the same input on i386 and ppc.
It has nothing to do with architecture; gzip records the timestamp of the file
it compresses:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>touch foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
Decklin Foster wrote:
> However, I soon discovered that gzip apparenly creates different
> compressed files for the same input on i386 and ppc.
It has nothing to do with architecture; gzip records the timestamp of the file
it compresses:
joey@gumdrop:~>touch foo
joey@gumdrop:~>gzip < f
Adam C Powell IV writes:
> Do the -b/-B options to dpkg-buildpackage answer your question?
That's it. thanks.
--
things change.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Decklin Foster wrote:
> My question is, how do people handle this? If I should just chill out
> and wait for the autobuilders to do their work (probably a "yes",
> that's what I'm doing today), what exactly goes on behind the scenes
> when a diff.gz with a new md5sum goes into Incoming? does it ju
Adam C Powell IV writes:
> Do the -b/-B options to dpkg-buildpackage answer your question?
That's it. thanks.
--
things change.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Decklin Foster wrote:
> My question is, how do people handle this? If I should just chill out
> and wait for the autobuilders to do their work (probably a "yes",
> that's what I'm doing today), what exactly goes on behind the scenes
> when a diff.gz with a new md5sum goes into Incoming? does it j
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 09:32:23AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have a bugreport for a package which is solved in a new
> version. and the bug report told me that it is fixed in the new
> package. it's a woody package but compiled for potato but
> shouldn't be a problem because it only
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 09:32:23AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have a bugreport for a package which is solved in a new
> version. and the bug report told me that it is fixed in the new
> package. it's a woody package but compiled for potato but
> shouldn't be a problem because it onl
H. S. Teoh writes:
> Could not chdir to home directory /debian/home/hsteoh: No such file or
> directory
I believe you need to log in to auric normally at least once so that
your home directory is created. Try uploading again after you do that.
> It appears twice, one before the files were upped,
H. S. Teoh writes:
> Could not chdir to home directory /debian/home/hsteoh: No such file or
> directory
I believe you need to log in to auric normally at least once so that
your home directory is created. Try uploading again after you do that.
> It appears twice, one before the files were upped
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 02:36:44AM -0500, Clay Crouch wrote:
> > > > I am currently in the process of creating several new packages.
> > > > However, one of these packages is destined for unstable/non-free,
> > > > and the rest are destined for unstable/
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 02:36:44AM -0500, Clay Crouch wrote:
> > > > I am currently in the process of creating several new packages.
> > > > However, one of these packages is destined for unstable/non-free,
> > > > and the rest are destined for unstable
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 02:36:44AM -0500, Clay Crouch wrote:
> > > I am currently in the process of creating several new packages.
> > > However, one of these packages is destined for unstable/non-free,
> > > and the rest are destined for unstable/contrib.
> > >
> > > What entries do I need to mak
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 02:36:44AM -0500, Clay Crouch wrote:
> > > I am currently in the process of creating several new packages.
> > > However, one of these packages is destined for unstable/non-free,
> > > and the rest are destined for unstable/contrib.
> > >
> > > What entries do I need to ma
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 01:51:31AM -0500, Clay Crouch wrote:
> > Greets, folks! :^)
> >
> > I am currently in the process of creating several new packages.
> > However, one of these packages is destined for unstable/non-free,
> > and the rest are destin
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 01:51:31AM -0500, Clay Crouch wrote:
> Greets, folks! :^)
>
> I am currently in the process of creating several new packages.
> However, one of these packages is destined for unstable/non-free,
> and the rest are destined for unstable/contrib.
>
> What entries do I need to
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 01:51:31AM -0500, Clay Crouch wrote:
> > Greets, folks! :^)
> >
> > I am currently in the process of creating several new packages.
> > However, one of these packages is destined for unstable/non-free,
> > and the rest are desti
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 01:51:31AM -0500, Clay Crouch wrote:
> Greets, folks! :^)
>
> I am currently in the process of creating several new packages.
> However, one of these packages is destined for unstable/non-free,
> and the rest are destined for unstable/contrib.
>
> What entries do I need t
On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 09:48:34AM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> The dictd source package generates two binaries, dict and dictd.
> I need to upload a new version of dict to fix a bug in the postrm
> script. I would like to avoid making people install a new version of
> dictd that is identical
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 07:38:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 01:35:14PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
>
> > Hmm, actually I just added a new userid to my key yesterday (my debian.org
> > address) and I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but there is no key of mine
> > (old or
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 01:35:14PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
>
> > Hmm, actually I just added a new userid to my key yesterday (my
> > debian.org address) and I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but
> > there is no key of mine (old or new) in the debian
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 01:35:14PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> Hmm, actually I just added a new userid to my key yesterday (my debian.org
> address) and I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but there is no key of mine
> (old or new) in the debian keyring just yet.. Should I have first waited
> for t
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 07:07:06PM +1200, Carey Evans wrote:
> Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I made a new version of the xinetd package (xinetd2.2.1-4.deb), but I am
> > having dificulty locating the guidelines for uploading new packages. I have
> > created a changes file, but
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:45:35AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Norbert Veber wrote:
> > Hi..
> >
> > I made a new version of the xinetd package (xinetd2.2.1-4.deb), but I am
> > having dificulty locating the guidelines for uploading new packages. I have
> > created a changes file, but I not
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:45:35AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Norbert Veber wrote:
> > Hi..
> >
> > I made a new version of the xinetd package (xinetd2.2.1-4.deb), but I am
> > having dificulty locating the guidelines for uploading new packages. I have
> > created a changes file, but I not
Norbert Veber wrote:
> Hi..
>
> I made a new version of the xinetd package (xinetd2.2.1-4.deb), but I am
> having dificulty locating the guidelines for uploading new packages. I have
> created a changes file, but I noticed that the changes files in Incoming on
> master.debian.org also have some
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
