Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> apt-get install hercules.
>
> and then:
> http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/giving_s_390_a_try.html
It worked! I was able to not only build mod_bt under a virtual
s/390, but actually get it up and running and test a few .torrents on it.
:
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (OTOH, your solution seems a bit fragile for a source package that wants
> to get compiled with -Werror. The two apache2 and php5 files that define
> WORDS_BIGENDIAN, also share 23 other macro definitions; as it happens,
> to the same value, which does n
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > but it also seems like a waste of time to upload it if it just has more
> > problems under the s390 arch. Should I continue attempting to find an s390
> > box, is there something somebody out there can do to help, or should I just
> > have my new pa
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> apt-get install hercules.
>
> and then:
> http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/giving_s_390_a_try.html
> http://blog.zobel.ftbfs.de/stuff/installing-debian-sarge-on-s390
Thanks, I'll give it a shot :) (BTW, love your domain name, and the
ir
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=mod-bt
>
> You'll see that it failed in five more architectures (mips powerpc sparc
> hppa m68k). In this case in particular, seems like all the big endian
> ones. :-)
Aaahh very useful page, thanks :
Hi Tyler,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:37:09AM -0700, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Please see:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375
>
> I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except
> I don't have access to an s390 box. :
* Tyler MacDonald [Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:37:09 -0700]:
Hi Tyler, let's see if I can give an useful answer to your questions and
concerns.
> Please see:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375
> I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except
> I
Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What's the Debian way of handling this? I know that if I upload the new
> > package to unstable, it will at least be no worse than the previous version,
> > but it also seems like a waste of time to upload it if it just has more
> > problems under the s39
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 11:37 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Please see:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375
>
> I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except
> I don't have access to an s390 box. :-/ I asked Bastian if he would be
> will
At Wed, 30 Oct 2002 06:45:15 -0500,
Neil L. Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> due to a compile error. I logged on to trex and attempted to build it in the
> unstable chroot. It built without error. Then I noticed that the error in
> the buildd log referred to a file /usr/include/c++/3.2/backwa
At Wed, 30 Oct 2002 06:45:15 -0500,
Neil L. Roeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> due to a compile error. I logged on to trex and attempted to build it in the
> unstable chroot. It built without error. Then I noticed that the error in
> the buildd log referred to a file /usr/include/c++/3.2/backwa
11 matches
Mail list logo
