Dne Sat, 10 May 2008 18:49:04 +0200
Clement Lorteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> > Unfortunately there is still one problem with the package: it
> > depends on python-gconf which is not available in Debian.
>
> Oopsy, i saw it before, then forgot it; sorry about that.
> Unfortunately there is still one problem with the package: it
> depends on python-gconf which is not available in Debian.
Oopsy, i saw it before, then forgot it; sorry about that. The
python-gconf dependency is not needed in Debian: I made a new package
which doesn't depe
Hi
Dne Sat, 10 May 2008 10:46:27 +0200
Clement Lorteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> Oh, right. I fixed it and uploaded the new package to
> mentors.debian.net. The details of the RFS don't change.
Unfortunately there is still one problem with the package: it depends
on python-gconf which is
Oh, right. I fixed it and uploaded the new package to
mentors.debian.net. The details of the RFS don't change.
Thanks,
Clement.
--
Clement Lorteau
www.lorteau.fr | launchpad.net/~northern-lights
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Clement Lorteau
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't that mean there's nothing to fix? In this case, yes, I have a
> build dependency while my package is architecture independent, but
> that's how python-central i think; and yes I have an "Encoding" key in
> my .des
> Now I only see two minor lintian warnings:
> $ lintian -I ../gtkvncviewer_0.2.3-1_i386.changes
> I: gtkvncviewer source: build-depends-without-arch-dep
> python-central
> I: gtkvncviewer:
> desktop-entry-contains-encoding-key
> /usr/shar
Hi
Dne Thu, 8 May 2008 00:24:37 +0200
"Clement Lorteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> I followed them all and uploaded the new package to
> debian.mentors.net, could the package get another look ? Contents of
> the RFS does not change, except "The upload would fix these bugs:
> 480055" which i
I followed them all and uploaded the new package to
debian.mentors.net, could the package get another look ? Contents of
the RFS does not change, except "The upload would fix these bugs:
480055" which is the newly filed ITP.
Thank you for your help.
---
RFS:
* Package name: gtkvncviewer
Ve
Hi
On Wed, 7 May 2008 10:38:29 +0200
"Clement Lorteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the comments. I made all the changes you mentioned. Would
> you (or someone else) mind checking the new package ?
>
> I also have a question: should I file an ITP, as your Lintian mentions
> (my Lintia
Thanks for the comments. I made all the changes you mentioned. Would
you (or someone else) mind checking the new package ?
I also have a question: should I file an ITP, as your Lintian mentions
(my Lintian is provided by Ubuntu)?
New RFS details:
* Package name: gtkvncviewer
Version
On Tue, 6 May 2008 10:18:33 +0200
"Clement Lorteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkvncviewer".
>
> * Package name: gtkvncviewer
> Version : 0.2.2-1
> Upstream Author : Clement Lorteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
Hi
On Tue, 6 May 2008 10:18:33 +0200
"Clement Lorteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkvncviewer".
>
> * Package name: gtkvncviewer
> Version : 0.2.2-1
> Upstream Author : Clement Lorteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
Thanks for the comment. I repackaged it as non-native.
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtkvncviewer
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtkvncviewer/gtkvncviewer_0.2.2-
Please provide a reason for why this should be a native package or
repackage it as non-native. See
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html#native_vs_non_native
for further information.
Helmut
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
14 matches
Mail list logo
