Re: retriggering the building of a package on all archs

2004-09-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 01:19:24AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:12:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > I can also reupload a new version of B, but it would be inappropriate > > > since nothing c

Re: retriggering the building of a package on all archs

2004-09-28 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:12:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > I think it's the preferred method, though. Certainly I've had bugs filed on > my packages to upload a new version so that the package gets rebuilt against > a new ABI. Beware that my package B has not been built against the wrong l

Re: retriggering the building of a package on all archs

2004-09-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:12:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > I can also reupload a new version of B, but it would be inappropriate > > since nothing changed in that package. > I think it's the preferred method, though. C

Re: retriggering the building of a package on all archs

2004-09-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I can also reupload a new version of B, but it would be inappropriate > since nothing changed in that package. I think it's the preferred method, though. Certainly I've had bugs filed on my packages to upload a new version so t

Re: retriggering the building of a package on all archs

2004-09-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I'm the maintainer of two packages, say A and B. B build depends on A, i > uploaded a bugged version of A, which inhibit building of B. Now I've > fixed the problem, but B needs to be rebuilt on all architectures. > Is there a s

Re: retriggering the building of a package on all archs

2004-09-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 01:19:24AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:12:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > I can also reupload a new version of B, but it would be inappropriate > > > since nothing c

Re: retriggering the building of a package on all archs

2004-09-28 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:12:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > I think it's the preferred method, though. Certainly I've had bugs filed on > my packages to upload a new version so that the package gets rebuilt against > a new ABI. Beware that my package B has not been built against the wrong l

Re: retriggering the building of a package on all archs

2004-09-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:12:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > I can also reupload a new version of B, but it would be inappropriate > > since nothing changed in that package. > I think it's the preferred method, though. C

Re: retriggering the building of a package on all archs

2004-09-28 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I can also reupload a new version of B, but it would be inappropriate > since nothing changed in that package. I think it's the preferred method, though. Certainly I've had bugs filed on my packages to upload a new version so t

Re: retriggering the building of a package on all archs

2004-09-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I'm the maintainer of two packages, say A and B. B build depends on A, i > uploaded a bugged version of A, which inhibit building of B. Now I've > fixed the problem, but B needs to be rebuilt on all architectures. > Is there a s