Hi!
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 06:41:19PM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> I was reviewing one of my own packages on the QA page¹ and was
> surprised to notice it gets full marks for CI/Rep. “Surprised? Isn’t
> that a good thing?” you say. It’s surprising because I’ve been
> tracking an upstream bug
Em Ter, 2016-07-19 às 12:42 +, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:38:44AM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> > I do not have a special interest in the package. Just
> > a QA to do. I also did a repository (collab-maint) for
> > it.
>
> You could/shoud have set Vcs-* in d/control
Hi,
> Something failed somewhere in the second build, not in the package build
> itself but rather in the building script and was not properly detected
> as an infrastructure error (but rather as a FTBFS).
> I triggered another build of the package and not it has built
> successfully.
Thanks for
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:38:44AM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> I do not have a special interest in the package. Just
> a QA to do. I also did a repository (collab-maint) for
> it.
You could/shoud have set Vcs-* in d/control for that.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups
There are apparently at least two computers that run it regularly:
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=dvbackup
Also, I assume Herbert has some reason for working on it.
--
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:20:51PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> >
> > > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
> > > it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The
> > > build was no
Am 2016-07-19 11:29, schrieb Dominique Dumont:
On Monday, July 18, 2016 6:20:51 PM CEST Herbert Fortes wrote:
dvbackup
Is this package worth the effort ?
Not a user myself, but the package is already in the archive (it's
not an ITP), and I think reproducibility for _all_ of Debian is a
goal
* Dominique Dumont , 2016-07-19, 11:29:
dvbackup
Is this package worth the effort ?
Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups when a 16GB
thumb drive has more capacity and is more practical for this purpose
than a DV camcorder ?
I certainly wouldn't recommend dvbackup for ma
On Monday, July 18, 2016 6:20:51 PM CEST Herbert Fortes wrote:
> dvbackup
Is this package worth the effort ?
Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups when a 16GB thumb
drive has more capacity and is more practical for this purpose than a DV
camcorder ?
All the best
--
https:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:20:51PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> >
> > > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
> > > it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The
> > > build was no
Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>
> > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
> > it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The
> > build was not tried again.
>
> Which package ?
dvbackup
https://tests.reproducible-bu
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
> it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The
> build was not tried again.
Which package?
> I can do something about the status of the
> package on reproducible-builds ? Or just
> wait for a new try
12 matches
Mail list logo
