On Tue, 8 May 2001, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2001-05-08 at 11:21:30 AM (+0200), T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> > AFAIK there's no netcdfg neither in the current testing release nor in
> >^
> > unstable. That is there's no netcdfg comming in from unstable either
On Tuesday, 2001-05-08 at 11:21:30 AM (+0200), T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> AFAIK there's no netcdfg neither in the current testing release nor in
>^
> unstable. That is there's no netcdfg comming in from unstable either
But xmgr depends on netcdfg3 which is available in
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2001-05-08 at 11:21:30 AM (+0200), T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> > AFAIK there's no netcdfg neither in the current testing release nor in
> >^
> > unstable. That is there's no netcdfg comming in from unstable either
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Torsten Werner wrote:
> some time ago I have uploaded a new xmgr package (4.1.2-6). The
> update-excuses file on ftp-master tells me, that this version will be
> installed if it does not depend on other buggy packages. As far as I can
> see, xmgr-4.1.2-6 does not depend on any
On Tuesday, 2001-05-08 at 11:21:30 AM (+0200), T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> AFAIK there's no netcdfg neither in the current testing release nor in
>^
> unstable. That is there's no netcdfg comming in from unstable either
But xmgr depends on netcdfg3 which is available i
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Torsten Werner wrote:
> some time ago I have uploaded a new xmgr package (4.1.2-6). The
> update-excuses file on ftp-master tells me, that this version will be
> installed if it does not depend on other buggy packages. As far as I can
> see, xmgr-4.1.2-6 does not depend on any
6 matches
Mail list logo
