Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> Do you have plans to become a Debian Developer, by the way?
>
> I used to have, but lately I've been too busy. I hope that,
> in a few months, I will be again following debian-devel et al.,
> and rethinking about becoming a DD.
No D
> Do you have plans to become a Debian Developer, by the way?
I used to have, but lately I've been too busy. I hope that,
in a few months, I will be again following debian-devel et al.,
and rethinking about becoming a DD.
> Or reformulate it so that everybody can get the meaning.
E.g. "I have
Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> Do you have plans to become a Debian Developer, by the way?
>
> I used to have, but lately I've been too busy. I hope that,
> in a few months, I will be again following debian-devel et al.,
> and rethinking about becoming a DD.
No D
Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Many thanks for your review!
>
>> Have you read the new maintainers guide, and had a look at the
>> developers' reference?
>
> Yes, at least once. But it's true that I should read them
> carefully these days...
>
>> I had a look at it,
> Do you have plans to become a Debian Developer, by the way?
I used to have, but lately I've been too busy. I hope that,
in a few months, I will be again following debian-devel et al.,
and rethinking about becoming a DD.
> Or reformulate it so that everybody can get the meaning.
E.g. "I have
Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Many thanks for your review!
>
>> Have you read the new maintainers guide, and had a look at the
>> developers' reference?
>
> Yes, at least once. But it's true that I should read them
> carefully these days...
>
>> I had a look at it,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 07:03:50PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Some packages maintain a debian directory in the upstream CVS, but
> > exclude it from source tarball releases. That way, the official Debian
> > maintainer can easily use a different debian directory for the packages
> > uploaded
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 07:03:50PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Some packages maintain a debian directory in the upstream CVS, but
> > exclude it from source tarball releases. That way, the official Debian
> > maintainer can easily use a different debian directory for the packages
> > uploaded
> But WHY ???
>
>
> IMNSHO it is a waste of effort to maintain a second debian directory.
>
> Co-operate with upstream for a good debian directory.
In my case, there was at least one practical reason for upstream to use
its own "debian/": he wanted "giac" being distributed in Quantian with
its
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 08:56:41AM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime wrote:
>
> > Bernard (upstream author) expressed his intention of including the
> > "debian" subdirectory in the upstream tree. In fact, he maintains deb
> > packages of Giac for Quantian (a mathematical
> But WHY ???
>
>
> IMNSHO it is a waste of effort to maintain a second debian directory.
>
> Co-operate with upstream for a good debian directory.
In my case, there was at least one practical reason for upstream to use
its own "debian/": he wanted "giac" being distributed in Quantian with
its
Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime wrote:
> Bernard (upstream author) expressed his intention of including the
> "debian" subdirectory in the upstream tree. In fact, he maintains deb
> packages of Giac for Quantian (a mathematical-oriented Knoppix
> derivate) but didn't have the time for a careful obs
Many thanks for your review!
> Have you read the new maintainers guide, and had a look at the
> developers' reference?
Yes, at least once. But it's true that I should read them
carefully these days...
> I had a look at it, and there are some problems:
>
> - The program is packaged as Debian na
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 08:56:41AM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime wrote:
>
> > Bernard (upstream author) expressed his intention of including the
> > "debian" subdirectory in the upstream tree. In fact, he maintains deb
> > packages of Giac for Quantian (a mathematical
Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime wrote:
> Bernard (upstream author) expressed his intention of including the
> "debian" subdirectory in the upstream tree. In fact, he maintains deb
> packages of Giac for Quantian (a mathematical-oriented Knoppix
> derivate) but didn't have the time for a careful obs
Many thanks for your review!
> Have you read the new maintainers guide, and had a look at the
> developers' reference?
Yes, at least once. But it's true that I should read them
carefully these days...
> I had a look at it, and there are some problems:
>
> - The program is packaged as Debian na
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:26:04PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> - The program is packaged as Debian native. This shouldn't be, it should
> have an orig.tar.gz and a diff.gz.
I wonder if it would be good idea to add some tests to lintian/linda
about it?
I often make similar mistakes... I make pa
Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As described in bug 155075, I intend to package GIAC, a computer algebra
> system developed by Bernard Parisse, author of the algebra software of
> HP 49G, 40G, 49G+, 48GII calculators.
>
> GIAC's homepage is
> http://www-fourier.u
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:26:04PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> - The program is packaged as Debian native. This shouldn't be, it should
> have an orig.tar.gz and a diff.gz.
I wonder if it would be good idea to add some tests to lintian/linda
about it?
I often make similar mistakes... I make pa
Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As described in bug 155075, I intend to package GIAC, a computer algebra
> system developed by Bernard Parisse, author of the algebra software of
> HP 49G, 40G, 49G+, 48GII calculators.
>
> GIAC's homepage is
> http://www-fourier.u
20 matches
Mail list logo
