Re: licenses

2009-12-12 Thread Gabriele Giacone
Charles Plessy wrote: > You can find a longer discussion about MD5 implementations in the following > thread on debian-mentors: > > http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/2009080604.ga32...@kunpuu.plessy.org Thanks Charles. I didn't look for similar cases otherwise I would have found yours also

Re: licenses

2009-12-12 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 04:52:45PM +0100, Gabriele Giacone a écrit : > Hello mentors, > The software I'm packaging includes 2 directories which contain files > like these [1][2] and considers them as externals. > [1] shows a license. Is it good for Debian? Should I only declare in > d/copyright tha

Re: licenses

2009-12-11 Thread Ben Finney
Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> writes: > The question was about licenses because if they were ok I would build > as is. It's fine that you ask this question here; but you will be more likely to get answers on that topic in the ‘debian-legal’ forum, which is dedicated to questions about the

Re: licenses

2009-12-11 Thread Gabriele Giacone
Hi Rogerio, Rogério Brito wrote: > I think that there are other packages in the archive that include this > file. That being said, why not use one of the libraries that already > provide md5 implementations? [...] > The samething here. I, for instance, use libssl-dev for a package of > mine (hfsp

Re: licenses

2009-12-11 Thread Rogério Brito
On Dec 11 2009, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > [1] shows a license. Is it good for Debian? Should I only declare in > d/copyright that software is "derived from the RSA Data Security, Inc. > MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm"? I think that there are other packages in the archive that include this file. Tha