On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:58:04PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> And could anyone tell me which command displays the functions contained in
> a library? I know there's something, but I can't remember it.
nm -D file.so.x.y.z # and look for stuff with a `T', IIRC. or something like
that
--
Digita
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:58:04PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> And could anyone tell me which command displays the functions contained in
> a library? I know there's something, but I can't remember it.
nm -D file.so.x.y.z # and look for stuff with a `T', IIRC. or something like that
--
Digita
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 03:07:45PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Now, with db3, I want to be sure that everyone realizes that they are
> compiling against libdb3, since the binary on-disk format of the .db's
> is different. So, you have to explicitly tell your builds that you want
> -ldb3, so ther
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 03:07:45PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Now, with db3, I want to be sure that everyone realizes that they are
> compiling against libdb3, since the binary on-disk format of the .db's
> is different. So, you have to explicitly tell your builds that you want
> -ldb3, so the
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:26:48AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> My latest package viewmol has a -ldb entry in the makefile.
>
> I asked on this list where on earth I'd find libdb.so to compile against,
> and you helpfully pointed me to libdb2-dev.
>
> However, since then, libdb3[-dev] has come ou
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:26:48AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> My latest package viewmol has a -ldb entry in the makefile.
>
> I asked on this list where on earth I'd find libdb.so to compile against,
> and you helpfully pointed me to libdb2-dev.
>
> However, since then, libdb3[-dev] has come o
6 matches
Mail list logo
