* Charles Plessy , 2012-02-13, 20:07:
I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.net’ a release of
the package, since at that point interested people (e.g. reviewers)
can rely on it, and the version should refer uniquely to what I
uploaded at that time.
Be aware, though, that some pe
Nicolas Dandrimont writes:
> Le 13/02/2012 à 13:14, Gergely Nagy écrivit :
>>
>> ${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
>> proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
>> worlds with as little of the worst as possible.
>
> Hi,
>
> This scheme
Boris Pek writes:
>> Depends on the situation. If it's a quick update, and I can followup
>> within moments, then indeed, there is no reason to increment the version
>> (see my "when it makes sense" comment above).
>>
>> But if hours, or even days can pass between iterations, then I much
>> prefe
> Depends on the situation. If it's a quick update, and I can followup
> within moments, then indeed, there is no reason to increment the version
> (see my "when it makes sense" comment above).
>
> But if hours, or even days can pass between iterations, then I much
> prefer a new version on mentors
Le 13/02/2012 à 13:14, Gergely Nagy écrivit :
>
> ${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
> proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
> worlds with as little of the worst as possible.
Hi,
This scheme is something I was thinking about doing
Boris Pek writes:
> Hi,
>
>> Personally, I like the middleground best (though, I haven't been
>> practicsing this yet, but this is how things would work in my ideal
>> world): upload to mentors.d.n with incremental versions (when it makes
>> sense; if the reviewer/potential sponsor spots a bug in
On 02/13/2012 07:14 AM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
worlds with as little of the worst as possible.
+1
--
Stephen M. Webb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-m
Hi,
> Personally, I like the middleground best (though, I haven't been
> practicsing this yet, but this is how things would work in my ideal
> world): upload to mentors.d.n with incremental versions (when it makes
> sense; if the reviewer/potential sponsor spots a bug in a version not
> announced,
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Ben Finney , 2012-02-13, 13:40:
>>> I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first
>>> version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it
>>> confuse some Debian robots ?
>>
>> It's fine. I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.n
Le Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:53:45AM +0100, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> * Ben Finney , 2012-02-13, 13:40:
> >>I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my
> >>first version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ?
> >>Will it confuse some Debian robots ?
> >
> >It's fine. I consider
* Ben Finney , 2012-02-13, 13:40:
I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first
version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it
confuse some Debian robots ?
It's fine. I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.net’ a
release of the package, since
Jerome BENOIT writes:
> I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first
> version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it
> confuse some Debian robots ?
It's fine. I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.net’ a
release of the package, since at that
12 matches
Mail list logo
