>>"Bob" == Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> While this is included in policy 3.2.1 (probably earlier - I
Bob> can't find it in the changelog), it is not mentioned in
Bob> upgrading-checklist.text.gz.
This was introduced in version 3.2.0.0. I should have been
mentio
>>"Bob" == Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> While this is included in policy 3.2.1 (probably earlier - I
Bob> can't find it in the changelog), it is not mentioned in
Bob> upgrading-checklist.text.gz.
This was introduced in version 3.2.0.0. I should have been
menti
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:14:47PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater
> > should/
> >
> > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional
> > (though rec
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:14:47PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater should/
> >
> > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional
> > (though recomme
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:14:47PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater
> should/
>
> "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional
> (though recommended) behavior.
I hope the Debian policy czars inte
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:14:47PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater should/
>
> "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional
> (though recommended) behavior.
I hope the Debian policy czars intend
On Sunday 28 January 2001 23:08, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Thus spoke Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 16:14:47:
> > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater
> > should/
> >
> > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is
> > optiona
Thus spoke Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 16:14:47:
>
> s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater
> should/
>
> "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional
> (though recommended) behavior.
>
Well. In this case:
exp
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 07:14:11PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Thus spoke Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 18:52:37:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there any standard way to create a version of a
> > debian package with debugging enabled (i.e. to use
> > the -g compiler switch during compilatio
On Sunday 28 January 2001 23:08, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Thus spoke Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 16:14:47:
> > s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater
> > should/
> >
> > "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is
> > option
Thus spoke Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 16:14:47:
>
> s/packages should/packages conforming to policy version 3.2.0 or greater should/
>
> "should" referring to the Policy definition, meaning that this is optional
> (though recommended) behavior.
>
Well. In this case:
expor
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 07:14:11PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Thus spoke Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 18:52:37:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there any standard way to create a version of a
> > debian package with debugging enabled (i.e. to use
> > the -g compiler switch during compilati
Thus spoke Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 18:52:37:
> Hi,
>
> is there any standard way to create a version of a
> debian package with debugging enabled (i.e. to use
> the -g compiler switch during compilation)?
you can do a DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug dpkg-buildpcakge,
packages should
Thus spoke Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-01-28 18:52:37:
> Hi,
>
> is there any standard way to create a version of a
> debian package with debugging enabled (i.e. to use
> the -g compiler switch during compilation)?
you can do a DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug dpkg-buildpcakge,
packages shoul
14 matches
Mail list logo