Re: header-only dependence

2014-03-22 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 02:28:28PM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > >> I'm packaging a library libA which depends on a header-only library > >> libB. > > How? > > libA's CMake build script checks for libB and the public headers of > libA #include libB headers. So how is this different from the usual

Re: header-only dependence

2014-03-22 Thread Paul Gevers
On 22-03-14 13:33, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm packaging a library libA which depends on a header-only library > libB. Obviously I need libB to be present whenever I build an > executable against libA. Where in debian/control will I have to fill > in libB? If I am correct, you should h

Re: header-only dependence

2014-03-22 Thread Nico Schlömer
>> I'm packaging a library libA which depends on a header-only library >> libB. > How? libA's CMake build script checks for libB and the public headers of libA #include libB headers. --Nico On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 01:33:25PM +0100, N

Re: header-only dependence

2014-03-22 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 01:33:25PM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > I'm packaging a library libA which depends on a header-only library > libB. How? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: header-only dependence

2014-03-22 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, 2014-03-22 13:33 GMT+01:00 Nico Schlömer : > I'm packaging a library libA which depends on a header-only library > libB. Obviously I need libB to be present whenever I build an > executable against libA. Where in debian/control will I have to fill > in libB? I think it should be in Depends of