On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:16:38PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:01:01PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> [snip]
> > Put another way, the orig directory you used was the 1.51-5 debianized
> > source dir, it should have been the pristine upstream source.
> right, i was mis
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:01:01PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
[snip]
> Put another way, the orig directory you used was the 1.51-5 debianized
> source dir, it should have been the pristine upstream source.
right, i was missing the point (stupid error btw). new packages on
http://debian.esaurito.ne
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:16:38PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:01:01PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> [snip]
> > Put another way, the orig directory you used was the 1.51-5 debianized
> > source dir, it should have been the pristine upstream source.
> right, i was mis
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:01:01PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
[snip]
> Put another way, the orig directory you used was the 1.51-5 debianized
> source dir, it should have been the pristine upstream source.
right, i was missing the point (stupid error btw). new packages on
http://debian.esaurito.ne
Hi,
Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:17:46PM +0100 wrote:
> ok, read and done proper changes.
good deal.
> >
> > For fortunes-it the source package is wrong, there should be a orig
> i've fixed that, using dpkg-source -b dir dir.orig. please check if it's
> correct
> now.
Take a look at
http://www.deb
Hi,
Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:17:46PM +0100 wrote:
> ok, read and done proper changes.
good deal.
> >
> > For fortunes-it the source package is wrong, there should be a orig
> i've fixed that, using dpkg-source -b dir dir.orig. please check if it's correct
> now.
Take a look at
http://www.debian
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:17:46PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:35:56AM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> > For fortunes-it the source package is wrong, there should be a orig
>
> i've fixed that, using dpkg-source -b dir dir.orig. please check if it's
> correct
> now.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:35:56AM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yay! Bug squashing ! :-)
yes, that is! ;)
>
> For both package, please take a looks at :
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu-guidelines
>
> specifically the version numbering section and th
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:17:46PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:35:56AM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> > For fortunes-it the source package is wrong, there should be a orig
>
> i've fixed that, using dpkg-source -b dir dir.orig. please check if it's correct
> now.
Th
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:35:56AM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yay! Bug squashing ! :-)
yes, that is! ;)
>
> For both package, please take a looks at :
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu-guidelines
>
> specifically the version numbering section and th
Hi,
Yay! Bug squashing ! :-)
For both package, please take a looks at :
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu-guidelines
specifically the version numbering section and the changelog entry
section.
For fortunes-it the source package is wrong, there should be a orig
Hi,
Yay! Bug squashing ! :-)
For both package, please take a looks at :
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu-guidelines
specifically the version numbering section and the changelog entry
section.
For fortunes-it the source package is wrong, there should be a orig
12 matches
Mail list logo
