Re: drbd package

2004-05-18 Thread David Krovich
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about uploading 0.7 to experimental now, and once it has stabilized > (and sarge has been released) put it in sid? Sounds like a good plan... I'll use that approach. Thanks.

Re: drbd package

2004-05-18 Thread David Krovich
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about uploading 0.7 to experimental now, and once it has stabilized > (and sarge has been released) put it in sid? Sounds like a good plan... I'll use that approach. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Re: drbd package

2004-05-17 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-05-17 David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]: > >> I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation. > >> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new > >> v

Re: drbd package

2004-05-17 Thread David Krovich
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello David, > > * David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]: >> I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation. >> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new >> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd li

Re: drbd package

2004-05-17 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-05-17 David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]: > >> I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation. > >> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new > >> v

Re: drbd package

2004-05-17 Thread David Krovich
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello David, > > * David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]: >> I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation. >> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new >> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd li

Re: drbd package

2004-05-17 Thread Nico Golde
Hello David, * David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]: > I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation. > Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new > version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the new > 0.7.x version in debian,

Re: drbd package

2004-05-17 Thread Nico Golde
Hello David, * David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-17 15:59]: > I'm the package maintainer for drbd. Here is the situation. > Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new > version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the new > 0.7.x version in debian,

Re: drbd package

2004-05-17 Thread David Krovich
Jeremy Lainé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new >> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the >> new 0.7.x version in debian, but keep the 0.6.x series in Debian as >> well. How should I go about this? > > If the

Re: drbd package

2004-05-17 Thread Jeremy Lainé
> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new > version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the > new 0.7.x version in debian, but keep the 0.6.x series in Debian as > well. How should I go about this? If the 0.7.x series is going to be the development versi

Re: drbd package

2004-05-17 Thread David Krovich
Jeremy Lainà <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new >> version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the >> new 0.7.x version in debian, but keep the 0.6.x series in Debian as >> well. How should I go about this? > > If the

Re: drbd package

2004-05-17 Thread Jeremy Lainé
> Currently, the stable version of drbd is the 0.6.x series. A new > version is on the way, the 0.7.x series. I'd like to package the > new 0.7.x version in debian, but keep the 0.6.x series in Debian as > well. How should I go about this? If the 0.7.x series is going to be the development versi