Hi,
Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>> > Do *not* get the upstream .tar.gz which may have changed for some
>> > mysterious reason.
>>
>> I don't think the upstream tar.gz have changed, but your orig.tar.gz is
>> not the same as the upstrea
Le 28 août 07 à 03:11, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
In any case if this is done then it *must* be documented in
debian/changelog and/or README.Debian-source.
The "*must*" in the above line is not supported by Debian policy.
So I'll c
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> In any case if this is done then it *must* be documented in
> debian/changelog and/or README.Debian-source.
The "*must*" in the above line is not supported by Debian policy.
So I'll change that to a "*should*" :-)
Regards,
Kapil.
--
--
Hello,
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> > Do *not* get the upstream .tar.gz which may have changed for some
> > mysterious reason.
>
> I don't think the upstream tar.gz have changed, but your orig.tar.gz is
> not the same as the upstream tar.gz. This happens if the orig.tar.gz was
> repa
Hi Kapil,
Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got hit by this so I wanted to note it down where it might be of
> use to others. It *is* elementary but then ...
>
> Suppose pkg_123.45.orig.tar.gz is already in the Debian archive.
>
> To build a new version pkg_123.45-xxx of th
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:46:56 +0530
Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not just debian/changelog but README.Debian-source. However, the point
> of my mail was not about *how* pkg_123.45.orig.tar.gz turned out to
> be different from upstream's version but what to do *if* it turned
> o
Hello,
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> I'm confused. Is this related to the other messages in this thread or
> did you mean to start a new thread?
I'm sorry that I posted to your thread and confused the issue. Many
apologies for the hijack.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:44:20AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > *Always* use the Debian version of the .orig.tar.gz by doing "apt-get -d
> > source pkg".
> > Do *not* get the upstream .tar.gz which may have changed for some
> > mysterious reas
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:18:52 +0530
Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got hit by this so I wanted to note it down where it might be of
> use to others. It *is* elementary but then ...
It sounds wrong to me - which package is this? Does the debian
changelog mention tha
9 matches
Mail list logo
