Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-21 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:28:11AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > well, good hint! > (inverting the test obviously or I remove all 'good' files ...) Oops. Sorry! -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to brin

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-21 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:28:11AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > well, good hint! > (inverting the test obviously or I remove all 'good' files ...) Oops. Sorry! -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bri

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 08:30:36AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > right! but these files resides in an example dir that is installed as > > whole and I don't wont to specify on a file by file basis which file > > have to be installed ... > > OK.. so install the files and then remove them from de

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 03:14:57PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:22:38PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Why do you need to remove them? As long as they are not installed > > into the binary package it is not a problem. > > right! but these files resides in an exam

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 08:30:36AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > right! but these files resides in an example dir that is installed as > > whole and I don't wont to specify on a file by file basis which file > > have to be installed ... > > OK.. so install the files and then remove them from d

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 03:14:57PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:22:38PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Why do you need to remove them? As long as they are not installed > > into the binary package it is not a problem. > > right! but these files resides in an exa

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:28:11AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > for i in debian/tmp/...examples/* ; do [ -r "$i" ] && rm -f "$i" ; done > That might do it... well, good hint! (inverting the test obviously or I remove all 'good' files ...) Tnx Cheers -- Stefano "Zack" Zacchiroli <

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:28:11AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > for i in debian/tmp/...examples/* ; do [ -r "$i" ] && rm -f "$i" ; done > That might do it... well, good hint! (inverting the test obviously or I remove all 'good' files ...) Tnx Cheers -- Stefano "Zack" Zacchiroli

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Hi Stefano! On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:22:38PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Why do you need to remove them? As long as they are not installed > > into the binary package it is not a problem. > > right! but these files resides in an example dir

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:22:38PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Why do you need to remove them? As long as they are not installed > into the binary package it is not a problem. right! but these files resides in an example dir that is installed as whole and I don't wont to specify on a file by fi

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 12:03:33PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Hi mentors, > I've an upstream archive which contains two dangling symlinks and I > obviously want them not to be part of the final binary package, whick is > the best solution? > > I try to remove them but the .diff.gz se

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Hi Stefano! On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:22:38PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Why do you need to remove them? As long as they are not installed > > into the binary package it is not a problem. > > right! but these files resides in an example dir

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:22:38PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Why do you need to remove them? As long as they are not installed > into the binary package it is not a problem. right! but these files resides in an example dir that is installed as whole and I don't wont to specify on a file by f

Re: dangling symlinks in upstream archive

2001-08-20 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 12:03:33PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Hi mentors, > I've an upstream archive which contains two dangling symlinks and I > obviously want them not to be part of the final binary package, whick is > the best solution? > > I try to remove them but the .diff.gz s