Re: bugreports potato/woody

2000-10-10 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:17:35PM +, Gerd Knorr wrote: > What is the recommended way to deal with bugs which are present in > the potato package but already fixed in woody? There is none. You're free to keep them open, or close them. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination an

Re: bugreports potato/woody

2000-10-10 Thread Chad Miller
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:17:35PM +, Gerd Knorr wrote: > What is the recommended way to deal with bugs which are present in > the potato package but already fixed in woody? If you're talking about reporting/bug-tracking, I just suggested a 'stableonly' BTS tag on debian-devel . (No one seem

Re: bugreports potato/woody

2000-10-10 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:17:35PM +, Gerd Knorr wrote: > What is the recommended way to deal with bugs which are present in > the potato package but already fixed in woody? There is none. You're free to keep them open, or close them. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination a

Re: bugreports potato/woody

2000-10-10 Thread Chad Miller
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:17:35PM +, Gerd Knorr wrote: > What is the recommended way to deal with bugs which are present in > the potato package but already fixed in woody? If you're talking about reporting/bug-tracking, I just suggested a 'stableonly' BTS tag on debian-devel . (No one see