Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Stanfords [EMAIL PROTECTED] client is not DFSG-free. Stanford won't release
> the source, and you need permission if you wish to write for a 3th party
> installer and no one is allowed to distribute the software. AFAIK, thats
> the reason why there's no [EMAIL PROTECT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams wrote:
> I'm not claiming to have an authoritative answer for all this, I'm not a DD
> yet.
Don't worry, I appreciate all feedback. But I would like to know what a
DD has to say about this.
> Why is it in contrib then? Just curious rea
On Friday 30 December 2005 2:40 pm, you wrote:
> > You have sorted out the licence problems with qd? It's currently in
> > contrib.
>
> What license problem whould that be?
I'm not claiming to have an authoritative answer for all this, I'm not a DD
yet.
> Dick Howell, the original author, explic
> You have sorted out the licence problems with qd? It's currently in
contrib.
What license problem whould that be?
Dick Howell, the original author, explicitly says on his website:
"This is free software; you can distribute it and/or modify it under the
terms of the GNU Public License. There is
On Friday 30 December 2005 1:40 pm, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> As of November 2005, I've picked up maintainance of qd, the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> queue dumper, after it's author passed away in August 2005.
So it's a new source package; much as if it had been spun out of kfolding:
http://packages.
5 matches
Mail list logo
