On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:36:28AM -0800, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> > How will applications linked against the original libfoo be able to
> > locate the symbols B and C? As these are called directly from the
> > application, the application would have to be linked against libbar.
> > You are addi
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:36:28 -0800 "Kevin B. McCarty"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Upstream of my library (Cernlib maintainers) only ships static
>> libraries, and the shared library support is hacked in by me. So I
>> have complete control over the soversion, but of co
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:36:28 -0800
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks everyone who answered so far! Unfortunately some of the answers
> (Steve Langasek's vs. Neil Williams') seem directly opposed :-)
In such cases, I defer to vorlon.
:-)
> > A better solution for libfoo, IMH
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:36:28AM -0800, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Thanks everyone who answered so far! Unfortunately some of the answers
> (Steve Langasek's vs. Neil Williams') seem directly opposed :-) I'd
> like to try to understand this better since I really know very little
> technical deta
Thanks everyone who answered so far! Unfortunately some of the answers
(Steve Langasek's vs. Neil Williams') seem directly opposed :-) I'd
like to try to understand this better since I really know very little
technical detail about how the runtime linker works.
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 08
Hi Kevin,
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 11:19:40AM -0800, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> I have a dumb library ABI question. Suppose I maintain a library
> libfoo.so that has public functions A(), B() and C(). Now there is a
> new release in which libfoo.so only provides A(), but it is now (newly)
> dynami
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:19:40 -0800
> "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a dumb library ABI question. Suppose I maintain a library
>> libfoo.so that has public functions A(), B() and C(). Now there is a
>> new release
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:19:40 -0800
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a dumb library ABI question. Suppose I maintain a library
> libfoo.so that has public functions A(), B() and C(). Now there is a
> new release in which libfoo.so only provides A(), but it is now
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:19:40 -0800, "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello, I have a dumb library ABI question. Suppose I maintain a
> library libfoo.so that has public functions A(), B() and C(). Now
> there is a new release in which libfoo.so only provides A(), but it is
> now (n
9 matches
Mail list logo
