On Thursday 26 August 2004 23:43, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On the other hand, as a comment, if the package has never been
> uploaded, it does not make sense to have several changelog entries
> (2.7c-1 and 2.7c-2). They should be put together, to avoid
> dpkg-buildpackage to build a .changes which wi
On Thursday 26 August 2004 23:43, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On the other hand, as a comment, if the package has never been
> uploaded, it does not make sense to have several changelog entries
> (2.7c-1 and 2.7c-2). They should be put together, to avoid
> dpkg-buildpackage to build a .changes which wi
Mathew is right. I have to be nicer with new people. And i should not write
mails at 2AM when i am almost falling asleep and not taking more care of my
language.
However my points stand. DFSG are the guides by which a DD and non-DD wanting
to put packages in the repository should be enlightened. T
Mathew is right. I have to be nicer with new people. And i should not write
mails at 2AM when i am almost falling asleep and not taking more care of my
language.
However my points stand. DFSG are the guides by which a DD and non-DD wanting
to put packages in the repository should be enlightened. T
> Hi people
>
> Well, about Raster3D. I have talked a little more with the author:
>
> *ABOUT THE LICENSE*
>
> OK, this is one time too many. It seems I must bow to the inevitable
> and add a paragraph marked "License" to the web site and to the
> distributed package. But it may take me some w
> Hi people
>
> Well, about Raster3D. I have talked a little more with the author:
>
> *ABOUT THE LICENSE*
>
> OK, this is one time too many. It seems I must bow to the inevitable
> and add a paragraph marked "License" to the web site and to the
> distributed package. But it may take me some w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I have a explicity permission to distribute Raster3D from the author. It
can also be used for commercial purposes.
The package is linda and linthian clean and is availabe at
http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/raster3d/
Could someone take
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 03:52:34PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> So... even with the author giving us permission to put Raster3D on
> Debian, it's necessary to have a license?
Explicit permission to distribute should be enough for non-free. Include
all the documentation you have (e.g. the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi people
Well, about Raster3D. I have talked a little more with the author:
*ABOUT THE LICENSE*
OK, this is one time too many. It seems I must bow to the inevitable
and add a paragraph marked "License" to the web site and to the
distributed packa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I have a explicity permission to distribute Raster3D from the author. It
can also be used for commercial purposes.
The package is linda and linthian clean and is availabe at
http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/raster3d/
Could someone take a loo
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 03:52:34PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> So... even with the author giving us permission to put Raster3D on
> Debian, it's necessary to have a license?
Explicit permission to distribute should be enough for non-free. Include
all the documentation you have (e.g. the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi people
Well, about Raster3D. I have talked a little more with the author:
*ABOUT THE LICENSE*
OK, this is one time too many. It seems I must bow to the inevitable
and add a paragraph marked "License" to the web site and to the
distributed package.
Chris Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Judging by what you've said in the mail, I doubt Raster3D could go in
> anything but non-free.
Which is why I never filed an ITP bug...
> It would help considerably to get an actual
> license with the package (though there could be one, the server is
Chris Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Judging by what you've said in the mail, I doubt Raster3D could go in
> anything but non-free.
Which is why I never filed an ITP bug...
> It would help considerably to get an actual
> license with the package (though there could be one, the server is
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 19:16, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi people
>
> I have created a package of Raster3D.
> It's available at http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/raster3d/
>
> There is no license for the program, but talking with th
* Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-23 20:16:34 -0300]:
> There is no license for the program, but talking with the auhtor, he
> allows the inclusion of the program on Debian.
DFSG[1]:
8. License Must Not Be Specific to Debian
The rights attached to the program must not depend o
* Nelson A. de Oliveira ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> There is no license for the program, but talking with the auhtor, he
> allows the inclusion of the program on Debian.
Based on his words, it looks like it'd be at *best* non-free. It
certainly could not be included in Debian proper. This is, i
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 19:16, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi people
>
> I have created a package of Raster3D.
> It's available at http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/raster3d/
>
> There is no license for the program, but talking with th
* Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-23 20:16:34 -0300]:
> There is no license for the program, but talking with the auhtor, he
> allows the inclusion of the program on Debian.
DFSG[1]:
8. License Must Not Be Specific to Debian
The rights attached to the program must not depend o
* Nelson A. de Oliveira ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> There is no license for the program, but talking with the auhtor, he
> allows the inclusion of the program on Debian.
Based on his words, it looks like it'd be at *best* non-free. It
certainly could not be included in Debian proper. This is, i
20 matches
Mail list logo
