-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 July 2004 02:59 pm, Brian Nelson wrote:
> "Nathaniel W. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Documentation was missing from the package for a while, but it's back
> > now; see /usr/share/doc/cdbs/cdbs.html and /usr/share/doc/cdbs/why.ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 July 2004 02:59 pm, Brian Nelson wrote:
> "Nathaniel W. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Documentation was missing from the package for a while, but it's back
> > now; see /usr/share/doc/cdbs/cdbs.html and /usr/share/doc/cdbs/why.ht
Hallo Bartosz,
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-23 18:35]:
> > > FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
> > > use dh_make to create debian/.
> >
> >
> > But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
> >
>
> I can say
Hallo Magnus,
* Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-23 18:34]:
> This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
> package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
> /usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
> so I simply l
Hallo Bartosz,
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-23 18:35]:
> > > FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
> > > use dh_make to create debian/.
> >
> >
> > But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
> >
>
> I can say
Hallo Magnus,
* Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-23 18:34]:
> This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
> package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
> /usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
> so I simply l
"Nathaniel W. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
>> > But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
>>
>> I can say only for myself, but c
"Nathaniel W. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
>> > But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
>>
>> I can say only for myself, but c
> Documentation was missing from the package for a while, but it's back now;
> see /usr/share/doc/cdbs/cdbs.html and /usr/share/doc/cdbs/why.html for
> starters.
>
> I agree, documentation is rather helpful to have. =)
well, _more_ documentation would be helpfull too.
we cannot say cdbs do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> > But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
>
> I can say only for myself, but cdbs is com
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> > FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
> > use dh_make to create debian/.
>
>
> But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
>
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is c
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2004 10:39 pm, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
> > use dh_make to create debian/.
>
>
> But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 22 July 2004 10:39 pm, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
> use dh_make to create debian/.
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
- --
Nathaniel W.
> Documentation was missing from the package for a while, but it's back now;
> see /usr/share/doc/cdbs/cdbs.html and /usr/share/doc/cdbs/why.html for
> starters.
>
> I agree, documentation is rather helpful to have. =)
well, _more_ documentation would be helpfull too.
we cannot say cdbs do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> > But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
>
> I can say only for myself, but cdbs is com
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> > FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
> > use dh_make to create debian/.
>
>
> But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
>
I can say only for myself, but cdbs is c
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> On Thursday 22 July 2004 10:39 pm, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
> > use dh_make to create debian/.
>
>
> But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 22 July 2004 10:39 pm, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
> use dh_make to create debian/.
But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-)
- --
Nathaniel W.
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
Justin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
> package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
> /usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
> so I simply left the one generated by dh_make (re
FYI, dh_installman is, by default, commented out in debian/rules, if you
use dh_make to create debian/.
Justin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Am 2004-07-22 23:40:23, schrieb Magnus Therning:
> build-stamp: config.status
>...
> cp debian/gcursor.1 gcursor.1
> ...
>
>Still no luck though. could someone give some hints on how to get the
>man-page to be installed?
Why not use 'dh_installman ' ?
>/M
Greetings
Michelle
Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
> package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
> /usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
> so I simply left the one generated by dh_make (re
Am 2004-07-22 23:40:23, schrieb Magnus Therning:
> build-stamp: config.status
>...
> cp debian/gcursor.1 gcursor.1
> ...
>
>Still no luck though. could someone give some hints on how to get the
>man-page to be installed?
Why not use 'dh_installman ' ?
>/M
Greetings
Michelle
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 11:40:23PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
> package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
> /usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
> so I simply left the
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 11:40:23PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> This ought to be a simple question to answer. I've just created a
> package for gcursor (no ITP filed yet). It's a binary executable in
> /usr/bin so it needs a man-page. However, there is none from upstream,
> so I simply left the
26 matches
Mail list logo
