On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:37:18AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > Should we require all submissions to mentors file an RFS?
> > >
> > > Please discuss. :-)
> >
> > IMHO The existing documentation advocates already on using RFS bugs:
> >
> > https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto/
> > "In
On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 05:53 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:37:18AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 05:20 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > There are corner cases (e.g sponsoree has already a sponsor) where an
> > > RFS is not needed, but as the rfs-howto s
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:37:18AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 05:20 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > There are corner cases (e.g sponsoree has already a sponsor) where an
> > RFS is not needed, but as the rfs-howto says, generally it should be
> > done as documented, and that is
On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 05:20 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:02:54AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The data now being added, be it on a subject line or via bts control all
> > require that a submission to mentors file an RFS. We have many that state
> > they d
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 04:02:54AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The data now being added, be it on a subject line or via bts control all
> require that a submission to mentors file an RFS. We have many that state
> they do not require a sponsor or not file an RFS. This makes processing
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
