Hi
I uploaded aldo-0.7.0-3 on mentors.debian.net.
Could you upload in debian this new version of the package?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:16:00AM +0200, Giuseppe Martino wrote:
> > - file an ITP bug and close it in debian/changelog
> Fixed
>
> > - the copyright information is incomplete - it misses e.g. the year number
> Fixed
>
> > - The TODO doesn't seem to have much of value for the end-user.
> Removed
Hi,
> - file an ITP bug and close it in debian/changelog
Fixed
> - the copyright information is incomplete - it misses e.g. the year number
Fixed
> - The TODO doesn't seem to have much of value for the end-user.
Removed TODO
I uploaded new package on mentors.debian.net
Thanks,
Giuseppe
sign
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:56:30PM +0200, Giuseppe Martino wrote:
> I worked on the new version of aldo, aldo-0.7.0.
>
> I uploaded aldo-0.7.0 on mentors.debian.net.
So far so good. Please:
- file an ITP bug and close it in debian/changelog
- the copyright information is incomplete - it misses e
Hi,
I worked on the new version of aldo, aldo-0.7.0.
I uploaded aldo-0.7.0 on mentors.debian.net.
Thanks in advance,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:06:15PM +0200, Giuseppe Martino wrote:
>
> Thank you Joost, with your suggetsion I revised all autotools support,
> also I changed the foolish directory tree in a more simple directory tree.
> So I rewrited Makefile.am and fixed autotools support. I released aldo-0.6.11.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:32:36AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
Thank you Joost, with your suggetsion I revised all autotools support,
also I changed the foolish directory tree in a more simple directory tree.
So I rewrited Makefile.am and fixed autotools support. I released aldo-0.6.11.
And now a
Re: Giuseppe Martino in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > The proper way to fix that is to ship a bootstrapped .tar.bz2.
>
> Ok, I replaced every link with a copy of its normal file
> (`config/install-sh' `config/mkinstalldirs' `config/missin
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:50:54PM +0200, Giuseppe Martino wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > The proper way to fix that is to ship a bootstrapped .tar.bz2.
>
> Ok, I replaced every link with a copy of its normal file
> (`config/install-sh' `config/mkinsta
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> The proper way to fix that is to ship a bootstrapped .tar.bz2.
Ok, I replaced every link with a copy of its normal file
(`config/install-sh' `config/mkinstalldirs' `config/missing' `./COPYING' & Co.)
using:
for I in $(find -type l)
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 04:14:57PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Bas Wijnen in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Please provide an updated upstream tarball.
> > >
> > > This will allow you to drop the build-dependency on the autotools,
> > > which is considered evil by most people anyway.
> >
> > Hu
Re: Bas Wijnen in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Please provide an updated upstream tarball.
> >
> > This will allow you to drop the build-dependency on the autotools,
> > which is considered evil by most people anyway.
>
> Huh? Looking at the output of bootstrap, it runs the autotools. Or do you
> me
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Giuseppe Martino in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >But what's more important. The build failed here:
> > >
> > >configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in config
> > >./config
> > >make: *** [config.status] Error 1
> >
Re: Giuseppe Martino in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >But what's more important. The build failed here:
> >
> >configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in config
> >./config
> >make: *** [config.status] Error 1
>
> The problem is a missed Build-Depends aboud automake1.9.
The proper way to
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:22:11PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 03:05:47PM +0200, Giuseppe Martino wrote:
>
> I have two things to say about this:
> - debian/ should not be in the orig.tar.gz, but only in the diff.gz. See [1].
> - Your diff.gz is huge, but it seems to contai
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 03:05:47PM +0200, Giuseppe Martino wrote:
> New package on: http://dakordhost.homelinux.org/~denever/aldo_debian
I have two things to say about this:
- debian/ should not be in the orig.tar.gz, but only in the diff.gz. See [1].
- Your diff.gz is huge, but it seems to conta
>Hi, Giuseppe...
Hi Christoph and thank you for your reply,
>> I have actually already read the New Maintainers Guide, and I have built
>> a Debian package for Aldo.
>
>Very good!
Thanks :)
>Allow me just express a few thoughts on your debianization:
>
>- the debian/rules file contains debhelp
Hi, Giuseppe...
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:22:04PM +0200, Giuseppe Martino wrote:
> Hello, I am the project administrator and developer of the Aldo
> project at savannah.nongnu.org:
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/aldo
> [...]
> The Homepage for the project is: http://aldo.nongnu.org
> Sou
18 matches
Mail list logo
