>> All changes are already uploaded to mentors, please review again.
>
> Uploaded to ftp-master.
Thank you so much :)
Best regards,
Neutron Soutmun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> All changes are already uploaded to mentors, please review again.
Uploaded to ftp-master.
Cheers,
--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
>> I am looking for a sponsor for new version 1.09-4
>> of my package "xiterm+thai".
>
> debian/copyright:
> - Upstream-Name: is for project name, not maintainer's name.
> - Upstream-Contact: should list both name and e-mail address
> for upstream contact.
Changed.
> - License text for GPL-2, wh
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for new version 1.09-4
> of my package "xiterm+thai".
debian/copyright:
- Upstream-Name: is for project name, not maintainer's name.
- Upstream-Contact: should list both name and e-mail address
for upstream co
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 08:40:19PM +0700, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> Please review again
Package looks good. Uploaded.
Cheers!
--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> No need to rename debian/lintian-overrides to debian/package.lintian-overrides
> for source package that only builds a single binary package like this one.
> debian/lintian-overrides should work just fine.
Reverted.
> And, as you
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 06:28:33PM +0700, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> Using dh_lintian now, and adjust the installation.
No need to rename debian/lintian-overrides to debian/package.lintian-overrides
for source package that only builds a single binary package like this one.
debian/lintian-overrides
> Looks good now. Just one small thing: now that the package has been moved
> to debhelper 7, please consider installing the lintian-overrides file with
> dh_lintian.
Using dh_lintian now, and adjust the installation.
Please review.
Best regards,
Neutron Soutmun
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:47 PM,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 05:07:36PM +0700, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> I just re-upload package to mentors.d.n, please re-download and
> review again.
Looks good now. Just one small thing: now that the package has been moved
to debhelper 7, please consider installing the lintian-overrides file with
d
> - Vcs-Svn is pointing to libthai SVN, not xiterm+thai's
Oh, sorry, it's my mistake. (fixed)
> - Is sharutils still needed as a b-dep?
No, it's not really used for a long time, forgot to remove (removed)
> - debian/copyright: are you sure to only publish for last year (2009)?
Sorry, I forgot thi
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:24:46AM +0700, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.09-3
> of my package "xiterm+thai".
- Vcs-Svn is pointing to libthai SVN, not xiterm+thai's
- Is sharutils still needed as a b-dep?
- debian/copyright: are you sure to only publish
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:50:41PM +0700, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.09-2
> of my package "xiterm+thai".
Done.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.09-1
> of my package "xiterm+thai".
Uploaded.
For future reference, please mention changes like the security issue in the RFS.
Please remember to prepare a security u
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.09-1
> of my package "xiterm+thai".
Uploaded.
For future reference, please mention changes like the security issue in the RFS.
Please remember to prepare a security u
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > When do you plan to release the new release ?
>
> My release goal left to be done is the documentation.
>
> Another change t
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When do you plan to release the new release ?
My release goal left to be done is the documentation.
Another change that may affect your Debian packaging task
is the renaming of xiterm.1 man page to xiterm+thai.1.
I've
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in the meantime I'm searching the informations for the security issue
> about the setuid/setgid which this package done, for now I found the
> security audit tools which I can do the basically tests.
> But I still do
> > > Looks like this in the upstream makefile:
> > >
> > > all allbin alldoc tags clean:
> > > @for I in ${subdirs}; do (cd $$I; ${MAKE} $@ || exit 1); done
> > >
> > > Should be replaced with this:
> > >
> > > all allbin alldoc tags clean:
> > > @for I in ${subdirs}
> >> Also, I think this line is wrong:
> >>
> >> cd doc ; mv -f xiterm.1 xiterm+thai.1
>
> If you have to use cd then it should be
>
> cd doc && mv -f xiterm.1 xiterm+thai.1
After the last time that I accept this concept, but after I review the
rules.
I think that, if the doc dir realy exist
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks like this in the upstream makefile:
> >
> > all allbin alldoc tags clean:
> > @for I in ${subdirs}; do (cd $$I; ${M
เมื่อ พฤ. 2008-04-17 เวลา 19:30 +0700, Neutron Soutmun เขียนว่า:
> > >> Also, I think this line is wrong:
> > >>
> > >> cd doc ; mv -f xiterm.1 xiterm+thai.1
> >
> > If you have to use cd then it should be
> >
> > cd doc && mv -f xiterm.1 xiterm+thai.1
>
> Clearly, Thanks for your comment.
Oo
Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> à¹à¸¡à¸·à¹à¸ à¸à¸¤. 2008-04-17 à¹à¸§à¸¥à¸² 11:25 +0800, Paul Wise
> à¹à¸à¸µà¸¢à¸à¸§à¹à¸²:
>> Also, I think this line is wrong:
>>
>> cd doc ; mv -f xiterm.1 xiterm+thai.1
If you have to use cd then it should be
cd doc && mv -f xiterm.1 xit
เมื่อ พฤ. 2008-04-17 เวลา 11:25 +0800, Paul Wise เขียนว่า:
> Also, I think this line is wrong:
>
> cd doc ; mv -f xiterm.1 xiterm+thai.1
>
> It should be this instead since you don't rename it in clean:
>
> cd doc ; cp -f xiterm.1 xiterm+thai.1
It my confusion, despite in the final when clean, t
เมื่อ พฤ. 2008-04-17 เวลา 11:27 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan เขียน
ว่า:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > for X11/Intrinsic.h in the configure script and investigate why
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > for X11/Intrinsic.h in the configure script and investigate why the
> > build doesn't fail when it isn't present. It looks like the return
> > v
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please try to fix the many GCC warnings in the next upstream release.
> I will check and report to the upstream.
Upstream is not using -Wall flag, so the warnings were missed during
clearing in the recent upstream. I'
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> for X11/Intrinsic.h in the configure script and investigate why the
> build doesn't fail when it isn't present. It looks like the return
> value from make in the src subdir isn't getting passed out to the
> top-level
Now I get a FTBFS due to not depending on libxt-dev for
X11/Intrinsic.h, which is used by main.h and xdefaults.h. Not sure
what changed since the other day, but please add libxt-dev to the
Build-Depends. Strangely the configure script did not fail, the
upstream Makefile did not fail and as a resu
> Please try to fix the many GCC warnings in the next upstream release.
I will check and report to the upstream.
> I see several warnings with lintian -I, please fix them and I will upload:
>
> W: xiterm+thai: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 16
> I: xiterm+thai: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.08-1
> of my package "xiterm+thai".
Please try to fix the many GCC warnings in the next upstream release.
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
I see several wa
30 matches
Mail list logo
