Hello Jonathan,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 03:15, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> there is a config.log file left in diff.gz, please remove it in the
>> >> next upload (probably before the 'rm' in config), but apart from that
>> >> the package looks fine so I uploaded it.
>
> Fixe
Hi Sandro
> >> there is a config.log file left in diff.gz, please remove it in the
> >> next upload (probably before the 'rm' in config), but apart from that
> >> the package looks fine so I uploaded it.
Fixed this in 0.8.4-7, if you have a moment perhaps you could take a
look? (there's no hurry)
> No, it's not normal: if that files was removed in clean target, then
> it would never have come out in .diff.gz; moreover, config.log is not
> removed in clean, but in build-stamp target.
My bad; I'll fix it in next package.
Thanks for the upload!
>
> --
> Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, m
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 20:07, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> there is a config.log file left in diff.gz, please remove it in the
>> next upload (probably before the 'rm' in config), but apart from that
>> the package looks fine so I uploaded it.
>
> I spotted that in lintian, but
> there is a config.log file left in diff.gz, please remove it in the
> next upload (probably before the 'rm' in config), but apart from that
> the package looks fine so I uploaded it.
I spotted that in lintian, but as far as I could find out it's normal
if the file gets removed in the clean targe
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 17:53, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> mh, distclean is not a target of debian/rules; what I suggest is using
>> something like
>>
>> clean: clean-patched unpatch
>> clean-patched: patch-stamp
>>
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> When you upload a package to ftp-master, there are 2 possibilities,
> it's ACCEPTED (hence included in the debian archive) or it's REJECTED.
> In the latter case, you can reupload the same revision, since from
> archice POV that revisio
Hello Jonathan,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 21:22, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sandro
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:33:57PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> ehm, I personally like to have all the changes in the revision =
>> "current revision in debian"+1, so -6, and you have the o
Hi Sandro
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:33:57PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> ehm, I personally like to have all the changes in the revision =
> "current revision in debian"+1, so -6, and you have the opportunity to
> "fix" this since your package FTBFS if build twice in a row. what
> does this mea
Hello Jonathan,
thanks a lot for the fast reply.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 15:21, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:00:52AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> - no need to "[ ! -f configure-stamp ] || ..." since -stamp targets
>> are only executed is -stamp file is
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:00:52AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> debian/compat
> - has 5 while you declare versioned build-dep on debhelper >=7
> debian/rules
> - don't export DH_VERBOSE
> - you can remove the commented header
Fixed
> - no need to "[ ! -f configure-stamp ] || ..." since -stamp targ
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 02:32, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am seeking a sponsor for my package webcpp
Here a review:
debian/compat
- has 5 while you declare versioned build-dep on debhelper >=7
debian/rules
- don't export DH_VERBOSE
- you can remove the co
12 matches
Mail list logo
