Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-12 Thread Ben Finney
Karl Ferdinand Ebert writes: > Hi, > > Am Thursday 12 March 2009 07:37:11 schrieb Kapil Hari Paranjape: > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > > > Not so! :-( > > There are Lintian errors in your manpage (hyphen used as minus sign)

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 > of my package "tmux". Here are some comments: - add FAQ to docs - add CHANGES file as upstream changelog - ITP bug will be closed by the first upload not the first packaging attempt

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Paul Wise wrote: > This sounds very much like 'screen', what advantages does it have over > 'screen'? Just quoting from the FAQ: * How is tmux different from GNU screen? What else does it offer? tmux offers several advantages over screen: - a clearly-de

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > tmux       - terminal multiplexer This sounds very much like 'screen', what advantages does it have over 'screen'? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 23:23:39 schrieb Ben Finney: > Karl Ferdinand Ebert writes: > > Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: > > > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been > > > uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you > > > chang

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Ben Finney
Karl Ferdinand Ebert writes: > Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: > > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been > > uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you > > changelog entry for the first release, it is only state «Closes: > > #

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Hi, Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:35:38PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 > > of my package "tmux". > > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package wa

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread René Mayorga
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:35:38PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 > of my package "tmux". > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you c

Re: RFS: tmux

2008-09-24 Thread Maximilian Gaß
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:03:25PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > Perhaps, someone else would like to provide some comments on that ? tmux's code is quite well good indeed, much better than the mess inside screen. I hade a little part in development about a year ago. Nicholas is very reponsive an

Re: RFS: tmux

2008-09-23 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 22 September 2008 22:04:44 Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > Hello, Hello, > there seems to be no interest in my package, but I will continue providing > updates to this list. Below is my proposal of debian/copyright. The package seems to be in a very good shape, but I don't currently ha

Re: RFS: tmux

2008-09-22 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Hello, there seems to be no interest in my package, but I will continue providing updates to this list. Below is my proposal of debian/copyright. Yours sincerely, Ferdinand Format-Specification: http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat?action=recall&rev=

Re: RFS: tmux

2008-09-14 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Hello, thanks a lot in advantage. I have provided a corrected line in control for "Depends:" (how silly I forgot that) and rewritten the short and long description (taken from the first paragraph of the manpage). Moreover I added the wanted watch file. I am quiet not sure about the final form o

Re: RFS: tmux

2008-09-13 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 12 September 2008 13:03:20 Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tmux". Hello, Package looks good to me, provided the following: * control: your Depends line is empty, but your package depends on libncurses5 (at least) run-ti