On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:34:31PM +0200, Chris Niekel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > PS: Personally I'd switch to Debhelper compatibility 4 instead of 1, too.
> > This would get rid of debian/conffiles.
[...]
> With debhelper 4, the build is d
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:24:50PM +0200, Chris Niekel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:43:34AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > That isn't mandated by POSIX, though, and there are shells in Debian
> > that don't do that. I agree with Andreas: use printf instead.
>
> A sponsor already uploaded th
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:24:50PM +0200, Chris Niekel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:43:34AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:13:44PM +0530, Ganesan R wrote:
> > > Or simply remove the -e option. builtin echo parses "\n" in bash as well as
> > > dash.
> Bash needs
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Nitpicking:
> * dh_undocumented should not be used any more (actually it is a
> NOOP since debhelper 4.1.30 anyway):
Removed.
> I am rather fluent in sh, but need to look up "shopt -s xpg_echo". This
> is tooo ugly. Just use
I
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:43:34AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:13:44PM +0530, Ganesan R wrote:
> > Or simply remove the -e option. builtin echo parses "\n" in bash as well as
> > dash.
Bash needs a shopt -s xpg_echo first, I did that in my package. I was
still afraid t
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:24:50PM +0200, Chris Niekel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:43:34AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > That isn't mandated by POSIX, though, and there are shells in Debian
> > that don't do that. I agree with Andreas: use printf instead.
>
> A sponsor already uploaded th
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:13:44PM +0530, Ganesan R wrote:
> > "Andreas" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am rather fluent in sh, but need to look up "shopt -s xpg_echo". This
> > is tooo ugly. Just use
> > -echo -e ",s/RUNFROM=.*/RUNFROM=$RET/\nw" \
> > +pri
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:13:44PM +0530, Ganesan R wrote:
> > "Andreas" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am rather fluent in sh, but need to look up "shopt -s xpg_echo". This
>> is tooo ugly. Just use
>> -echo -e ",s/RUNFROM=.*/RUNFROM=$RET/\nw" \
>> +printf
> "Andreas" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am rather fluent in sh, but need to look up "shopt -s xpg_echo". This
> is tooo ugly. Just use
> -echo -e ",s/RUNFROM=.*/RUNFROM=$RET/\nw" \
> +printf ",s/RUNFROM=.*/RUNFROM=$RET/\nw\n" \
> or grab the patch from th
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:34:31PM +0200, Chris Niekel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > PS: Personally I'd switch to Debhelper compatibility 4 instead of 1, too.
> > This would get rid of debian/conffiles.
[...]
> With debhelper 4, the build is d
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:24:50PM +0200, Chris Niekel wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:43:34AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:13:44PM +0530, Ganesan R wrote:
> > > Or simply remove the -e option. builtin echo parses "\n" in bash as well
> > > as
> > > dash.
> Bash
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:43:34AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:13:44PM +0530, Ganesan R wrote:
> > Or simply remove the -e option. builtin echo parses "\n" in bash as well as
> > dash.
Bash needs a shopt -s xpg_echo first, I did that in my package. I was
still afraid t
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Nitpicking:
> * dh_undocumented should not be used any more (actually it is a
> NOOP since debhelper 4.1.30 anyway):
Removed.
> I am rather fluent in sh, but need to look up "shopt -s xpg_echo". This
> is tooo ugly. Just use
I
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:13:44PM +0530, Ganesan R wrote:
> > "Andreas" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am rather fluent in sh, but need to look up "shopt -s xpg_echo". This
> > is tooo ugly. Just use
> > -echo -e ",s/RUNFROM=.*/RUNFROM=$RET/\nw" \
> > +pri
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:13:44PM +0530, Ganesan R wrote:
> > "Andreas" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am rather fluent in sh, but need to look up "shopt -s xpg_echo". This
>> is tooo ugly. Just use
>> -echo -e ",s/RUNFROM=.*/RUNFROM=$RET/\nw" \
>> +printf
> "Andreas" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am rather fluent in sh, but need to look up "shopt -s xpg_echo". This
> is tooo ugly. Just use
> -echo -e ",s/RUNFROM=.*/RUNFROM=$RET/\nw" \
> +printf ",s/RUNFROM=.*/RUNFROM=$RET/\nw\n" \
> or grab the patch from th
Chris Niekel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To add some information to my previous post (in the hope of attracting
> some more attention)
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, Chris Niekel wrote:
>> The 'sn' package was orphaned, and I ITA'ed it. I'm not a DD yet, and
>> this is my first pac
Chris Niekel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To add some information to my previous post (in the hope of attracting
> some more attention)
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, Chris Niekel wrote:
>> The 'sn' package was orphaned, and I ITA'ed it. I'm not a DD yet, and
>> this is my first pac
To add some information to my previous post (in the hope of attracting
some more attention)
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, Chris Niekel wrote:
> The 'sn' package was orphaned, and I ITA'ed it. I'm not a DD yet, and
> this is my first package, so I would like to receive some feedback on
To add some information to my previous post (in the hope of attracting
some more attention)
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, Chris Niekel wrote:
> The 'sn' package was orphaned, and I ITA'ed it. I'm not a DD yet, and
> this is my first package, so I would like to receive some feedback on
20 matches
Mail list logo
