Re: RFS: queuegraph (take two)

2006-09-01 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Conall O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.01.0739 +0200]: > > Good evening to Dublin! > > Why thank you, however I'm currently in Maui, Hawaii. :P~ Then get off your computer, silly! Especially since you're apparently enjoying yourself so much to the point of drooling from the tip o

Re: RFS: queuegraph (take two)

2006-08-31 Thread Conall O'Brien
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:22:26PM IST, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> incoherently babbled: > Good evening to Dublin! Why thank you, however I'm currently in Maui, Hawaii. :P~ Good morning on Limerick however... :) > Maybe consider updating the dh-make package? Ah ha! My debian/ script

Re: RFS: queuegraph (take two)

2006-08-31 Thread martin f krafft
Good evening to Dublin! also sprach Conall O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.2214 +0200]: > > debian/control: any reason why Homepage: is indented? > > I see this has already sparked a thread. I merely followed an example I > was previously pointed to. It's okay as it is; my bad. > >

Re: RFS: queuegraph (take two)

2006-08-31 Thread Conall O'Brien
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:34:55AM IST, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> incoherently babbled: Hey Martin, > debian/control: any reason why Homepage: is indented? I see this has already sparked a thread. I merely followed an example I was previously pointed to. > debian/copyright: you d

Re: RFS: queuegraph (take two)

2006-08-31 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 31 August 2006 14:48, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1114 +0200]: > > I grabbed some of your packages[1], but failed to see any text you > > claim any copyright over your packaging. I'm just curious if there > > is any standard text w

Re: RFS: queuegraph (take two)

2006-08-31 Thread Tobias Klauser
On 2006-08-31 at 10:34:55 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also sprach Conall O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1003 +0200]: > > queuegraph - a RRDtool frontend for Postfix queue-statistics > > > > The package is lintian clean. > > Some more comments:

Re: RFS: queuegraph (take two)

2006-08-31 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1114 +0200]: > I grabbed some of your packages[1], but failed to see any text you > claim any copyright over your packaging. I'm just curious if there > is any standard text wrt to that like: > > It was downloaded from ... Upstream Author

Re: RFS: queuegraph (take two)

2006-08-31 Thread Arjan Oosting
Op do, 31-08-2006 te 12:14 +0300, schreef George Danchev: > I grabbed some of your packages[1], but failed to see any text you claim any > copyright over your packaging. I'm just curious if there is any standard text > wrt to that like: > > It was downloaded from > ... > Upstream Author > ... >

Re: RFS: queuegraph (take two)

2006-08-31 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 31 August 2006 11:34, martin f krafft wrote: > Hi Conall, > > also sprach Conall O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1003 +0200]: > > queuegraph - a RRDtool frontend for Postfix queue-statistics > > The package is lintian clean. > > Some more comments: > debian/copyright: you don

Re: RFS: queuegraph (take two)

2006-08-31 Thread martin f krafft
Hi Conall, also sprach Conall O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1003 +0200]: > queuegraph - a RRDtool frontend for Postfix queue-statistics > > The package is lintian clean. Some more comments: debian/control: any reason why Homepage: is indented? debian/copyright: