Hi Ansgar,
> sorry that I could not look at your package even after I said that I
> would earlier, but I did not have enough free time. But it was uploaded
> in the end anyway :)
No problem - I've just fixed another bug (#641538) in my local packet.
> It is not possible to change the package a
Hi,
sorry that I could not look at your package even after I said that I
would earlier, but I did not have enough free time. But it was uploaded
in the end anyway :)
wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes:
> Could you please re-upload the package? I've just uploaded the latest
> version to mentors. So
On 01/08/2012 10:27 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can anyone re-upload the package ? :)
>
> regards,
> Werner Detter
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=wer...@aloah-from-hell.de
It's in, as you can see!
I don't think re-uploading only for the /etc/default/policyd-weight
is
On 01/06/2012 09:32 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I've received an email from Debian FTP-Masters with the information that the
> package got
> rejected:
>
> ---
> Reject Reasons:
> policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [ 'exceptions.NameErro
Hi,
can anyone re-upload the package ? :)
regards,
Werner Detter
Am 07.01.12 11:45, schrieb wer...@aloah-from-hell.de:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I've just installed my policyd-weight package from unstable. There my
> /etc/default/policyd-weight file is not created, currently I'm not sure
> if the ver
Dear Mentors,
I've just installed my policyd-weight package from unstable. There my
/etc/default/policyd-weight file is not created, currently I'm not sure
if the version that has been uploaded to mentors does include the
/etc/default/policyd-weight file already so I've downloaded the source
and i
Hi Arno,
>> a) it's ok that the files reside in the debian directory ?
>> b) I missed a "dh_clean" (or pedant) somewhere ?
>> c) I have to delete those manually?
>
> I didn't actually try your source package, but it looks feasible. These
> files are created by a regular build process and entirely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Werner,
On 06.01.2012 21:24, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> a) it's ok that the files reside in the debian directory ?
> b) I missed a "dh_clean" (or pedant) somewhere ?
> c) I have to delete those manually?
I didn't actually try your sourc
Hi again,
I do have another question left.
I've just discovered that there are some files left in the debian directory
after package
creation, e.g.
debian/files
debian/policyd-weight.*
debian/policyd-weight.*.debhelper
debian/*.dephelper.log
debian/policyd-weight/
As source packages should not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06.01.2012 14:45, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
>> That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent
>> persons, maybe they can help you out.
Mark fixed a bug in dak which produced your faulty error message. The
problem was the
Hi Arno,
> That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent
> persons, maybe they can help you out.
OK, thank you :)
Have a nice day,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06.01.2012 14:32, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> What's wrong?
That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent
persons, maybe they can help you out.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuP
Hi Thomas,
I've received an email from Debian FTP-Masters with the information that the
package got
rejected:
---
Reject Reasons:
policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [: global name 'MTime' is not defined]
---
What's wrong?
Thanks,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi Thomas,
> I'd add a file there, with lots of comments, and all the options that
> you can put in it. It doesn't mater if absolutely every options are
> commented out, the point is to document what can be done with
> useful comments.
>
> Maybe you can do that on your next upload?
done :) I've
On 01/06/2012 07:44 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> thanks for your helpfull comments.
>
>
>> What was in /etc/default/policyd-weight? Why aren't you using
>> it anymore?
>>
> It behaves like the current package in unstable/testing/stable.
> The file /etc/default/polic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Werner,
On 06.01.2012 13:32, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> I think that's the way to go. But where in source package should i put
> the file in my source package? I would then copy the file by postinst
> to /etc/default/policyd-weight ?
ty
Hi Arno,
> there is a slight disagreement between several positions within Debian
> regarding /etc/default/daemon options. That's confusing and something we
> should work on, but that needs to be addressed at a higher level.
Ok, i see.
> For you, in particular, you can choose either alternative
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Werner,
On 06.01.2012 12:44, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> What should we do here? Generate the file? Or don't take account of
> it in the init script?
there is a slight disagreement between several positions within Debian
regarding /etc/d
Hi Thomas,
thanks for your helpfull comments.
> What was in /etc/default/policyd-weight? Why aren't you using
> it anymore?
It behaves like the current package in unstable/testing/stable.
The file /etc/default/policyd-weight isn't created but the init
script takes account of it.
/etc/default/po
On 01/06/2012 01:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Your debian/init.d script shouldn't set the PATH at all.
> All the folders it is putting in PATH are already accessible
> in the default $PATH, so don't change it.
>
FYI, pabs don't agree with me, and think declaring the $PATH
is the way to go. So
On 01/06/2012 02:07 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "policyd-weight".
>
> * Package name: policyd-weight
>Version : 0.1.15.2-1
>Upstream Author : Robert Felber
> * URL : www.policyd-weight.org
> *
21 matches
Mail list logo
