Re: RFS: packagekit (ping2)

2010-10-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
> > [...] (lots of further info on packagekit) > > Well, I am a DD and in principle could sponsor such a package, but I just > lack > all the know how needed to properly evaluate gnome-related packages. And, > as I > already wrote in another reponse to an RFS some minutes ago, it seems that > nob

Re: RFS: packagekit (ping2)

2010-10-13 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Matthias, > On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:38:59 +0200, Julien Viard de Galbert > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:23PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > >> Dear mentors, > >> > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "packagekit". > >> This package has been reviewed by Paul Wise and Ashees

Re: RFS: packagekit (ping2)

2010-10-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:38:59 +0200, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:23PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "packagekit". >> This package has been reviewed by Paul Wise and Asheesh Laroia already >> and >> s

Re: RFS: packagekit (ping2)

2010-10-08 Thread Julien Viard de Galbert
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:23PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "packagekit". > This package has been reviewed by Paul Wise and Asheesh Laroia already and > should be completely free of any policy violations or other problems > regardi