Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-03 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Paul Wise ha scritto: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, I know, but I prefer (and I'm using) mod-spamhaus because: > > Fair enough, I've uploaded the package. > > Thanks for your work, please mail debian-mentors for future uploads > and I'l

Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I know, but I prefer (and I'm using) mod-spamhaus because: Fair enough, I've uploaded the package. Thanks for your work, please mail debian-mentors for future uploads and I'll upload if I am able. -- bye, pabs

Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-03 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Paul Wise ha scritto: > Sorry about this, but I just noticed that there is already a DNSBL > module for apache2 in Debian (libapache2-mod-defensible). Please > investigate if mod-spamhaus is useful to add despite that. > Yes, I know, but I prefer (and I'm using) mod-spamhaus because: 1) I can ch

Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fixed and uploaded again on mentors. Sorry about this, but I just noticed that there is already a DNSBL module for apache2 in Debian (libapache2-mod-defensible). Please investigate if mod-spamhaus is useful to add des

Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-03 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Paul Wise ha scritto: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.7-1.dsc > > Some more things: > > Your package description needs some grammar fixes, please ask for a > review on deb

Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Upstream's license grant is unclear about the GPL version; "either > version 3 of the License." doesn't make sense. In addition, the Makefile and the source code say it is GPL v2 or later. I think upstream should make up thei

Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.7-1.dsc Some more things: Your package description needs some grammar fixes, please ask for a review on debian-l10n-english. You don't specify

Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-02 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Paul Wise ha scritto: > A review of your source package: > > debian/watch should use the standard sf qa redirector, please read the > uscan manual page. > > The upstream source does not contain any copyright information, you > might want to ask them to fix that. > > There is a new upstream versi

Re: RFS: mod-spamhaus

2008-11-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mod-spamhaus/mod-spamhaus_0.6-1.dsc A review of your source package: debian/watch should use the standard sf qa redirector, please read the uscan manual page. The upstrea