Hi,
[...]
> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-1
> >> of my package "libharu".
> >>
[...]
Looks good. Built, signed, and uploaded.
Best,
Michael
pgpwxxdN84WF6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dear Michael,
Thanks for reviewing. Sorry for the late reply - I've been without
internet at home until yesterday.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-1
>> of my package "libharu".
>>
>> It builds these binary packag
Hi,
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-1
> of my package "libharu".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> (new) libhpdf-2.2.1 - C library for generating pdf files
> libhpdf-dev - C library for generating pdf files (development files)
>
> I've tested the pa
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
>
>> - I've removed the .symbols because it is a bit irrelevant in a
>> package whose name changes when the so-name changes (see discussion on
>> d.mentors: [0].
>> [0]: http://lists.debia
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> - I've removed the .symbols because it is a bit irrelevant in a
> package whose name changes when the so-name changes (see discussion on
> d.mentors: [0].
> [0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/07/msg00365.html
Ahh, the packa
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
wrote:
> 1) the source package contains bindings for python, pascal, freebasic,
> ruby and C#. Since my knowledge of those languages is too small to
> support these bindings, I chose not to package them (yet).
Fair enough.
> 2) Somewhat relate
Dear mentors/sponsors,
I have updated my libharu package, a C library for generating pdf files.
dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libharu/libharu_2.1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
Three notes:
1) the source package contains bindings for python, pascal, freebasic,
ruby and C#. Since my knowledge
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
wrote:
> Makes sense. So is it ok to move the (updated) long description to the
> -dev package and use only a short description for libhpdf?
Probably yes. Obviously not everything will apply.
> I was randomly searching other libraries, and coul
Dear Paul,
Thanks for your (extensive!) review. Most of your comments were clear,
but still a few questions here:
On May 16, 5:50 am, Paul Wise wrote:
> The libhpdf-dev package description should have more detail than the
> libhpdf-2.1.0 description since the latter will always be
> automatical
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libharu".
Here is a review:
I assume you have read libpkg-guide and its bug reports?
The libhpdf-dev package description should have more detail than the
libhpdf-2.1.0 description since the l
10 matches
Mail list logo
