> Actually what I was saying is that the libxpm within the lesstif
> package has remained stagnant for many years while the separate
> libxpm has evolved, so those are in that package. You can see
> this progression in the libxpm repo [0].
Ah, sorry, I completely misunderstood. The way you say it
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:06:29 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On top of that, there are a few spelling corrections, and a couple
>> cases of refactoring/improving the code in the standalone version.
>
> If this is really the case, I would propose to get these improvements
> into the libxpm package (a
> One issue that I see with your changes, although I don't know enough
> about libraries to tell know if I am right, is that you reduced the
> symbols (as lesstif doesn't have them after your change).
Interestingly, an other discussion on this list [1], mentions the Debian
policy (8.1) where it is
Hi Michael,
[This e-mail is not as coherent as I intended, I hope you catch what I
mean. Don't hesitate to ask clarification.]
> On the surface, the diff between the embeded library in lesstif and
> the standalone libxpm seem rather large. However, if you dig into it,
> you'll notice that 95% of
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:31:11 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Have you investigated the changes made by upstream lesstif in the
> embedded code and verified that they are not necessary?
Hi,
On the surface, the diff between the embeded library in lesstif and
the standalone libxpm seem rather large. Ho
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your interest in lesstif. As I made the last couple of rounds
of changes and are listed as one of the maintainers, I would have
appreciated it when you had included me in your cc and maybe even have
communicated about your intentions before contacting the mentors list.
That
Charles Plessy wrote:
> do not hesitate to ping the maintainers of packages that depend on lesstif for
> this task.
Aaron M. Ucko was so kind to sponsor lesstif2. As the maintainer of a
dependent package he rather keeps lesstif2 in the archive. :)
Hopefully, I can get some long standing bugs out
Le Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 06:16:08PM +0100, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>
> Point taken. I will do what I want to do with lesstif next weekend/weeks
> and if nobody steps up to sponsor I will leave it on mentors and on
> Alioth and just provide a package at Launchpad [1] for a while.
Dear Paul,
do not h
> Hi mentors,
Hi,
> Paul Gevers wrote:
> > I am looking for a thourough check of my packaging and preferably a
> > sponsor for the new version 1:0.95.2-1 of my package "lesstif2" [0].
> > This new upstream version is only the incorporation of a lot of patches
> > already incorporated in the curr
Hi mentors,
Paul Gevers wrote:
> I am looking for a thourough check of my packaging and preferably a
> sponsor for the new version 1:0.95.2-1 of my package "lesstif2" [0].
> This new upstream version is only the incorporation of a lot of patches
> already incorporated in the current version of les
Hi Paul,
first of all, thanks for your work in Debian
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:57, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi mentors and mentees,
>
> [Sorry for the long mail, there are several issues/questions.]
>
> I am looking for a thourough check of my packaging and preferably a
> sponsor for the new versio
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 22:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> I hope somebody is able to give me more feedback (or ultimately upload
>>> the package).
>>
>> uploaded.
>
> Thanks, but no comments?
>
Hmmm,
comments:
1. package is lintian clean.
2. two program works as expected: xmgrace (from package gra
>> I hope somebody is able to give me more feedback (or ultimately upload
>> the package).
>
> uploaded.
Thanks, but no comments?
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 18:33, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> This is a big package with a high popcon count, do you have the time
>> for such a large task? On your own? Is there any upstream activity?
>
> I have the intention to try. And of course all help is appreciated, but
> I would say that any improve
> This is a big package with a high popcon count, do you have the time
> for such a large task? On your own? Is there any upstream activity?
I have the intention to try. And of course all help is appreciated, but
I would say that any improvement over inactivity is good. I really think
this cleanin
Am 29.04.2009 23:12, schrieb Neil Williams:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:09:37 +0200
Paul Gevers wrote:
W: lesstif2 source: outdated-autotools-helper-file config.guess
2005-05-15 W: lesstif2 source: outdated-autotools-helper-file
config.sub 2005-05-12
The PTS claims 85 lintian errors and warnings
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:09:37 +0200
Paul Gevers wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.95.0-2.2
> of the package "lesstif2", this is not my package but I thought it
> needed some attention.
This is a big package with a high popcon count, do you have the time
for such a large
17 matches
Mail list logo
