[no need to CC me, I'm subscribed to d-mentors]
On Seg, 2004-10-18 at 11:01, Chris Vanden Berghe wrote:
> Hi Leo,
Hi
> I decided to make my own gaim-encryption package, since:
Your motives are perfect. I agree with all of them.
> You're right about the gaim headers: it would be much nicer to hav
Hi Leo,
Well, first let me say that I didn't know about your ITP [1]. I just
saw now that your page is the one linked from the gaim-encryption
website, that I actually had seen before.
I decided to make my own gaim-encryption package, since:
1) I thought it would be something useful to have in
[no need to CC me, I'm subscribed to d-mentors]
On Seg, 2004-10-18 at 11:01, Chris Vanden Berghe wrote:
> Hi Leo,
Hi
> I decided to make my own gaim-encryption package, since:
Your motives are perfect. I agree with all of them.
> You're right about the gaim headers: it would be much nicer to hav
Hi
On Seg, 2004-10-18 at 05:06, Chris Vanden Berghe wrote:
> I've been in contact with the gaim developers who seem to be reluctant
> to add a gaim-dev package in the near future (they are considering an
> experimental package, though). Therefore, I think it is better to go
> ahead and just ship
Hi Leo,
Well, first let me say that I didn't know about your ITP [1]. I just
saw now that your page is the one linked from the gaim-encryption
website, that I actually had seen before.
I decided to make my own gaim-encryption package, since:
1) I thought it would be something useful to have in
Hi
On Seg, 2004-10-18 at 05:06, Chris Vanden Berghe wrote:
> I've been in contact with the gaim developers who seem to be reluctant
> to add a gaim-dev package in the near future (they are considering an
> experimental package, though). Therefore, I think it is better to go
> ahead and just ship
Ok, thanks for the note, I did not know about his unofficial package.
And, yes, there is quite a big difference in the packages.
I've been in contact with the gaim developers who seem to be reluctant
to add a gaim-dev package in the near future (they are considering an
experimental package, thoug
Ok, thanks for the note, I did not know about his unofficial package.
And, yes, there is quite a big difference in the packages.
I've been in contact with the gaim developers who seem to be reluctant
to add a gaim-dev package in the near future (they are considering an
experimental package, thoug
begin quotation of Chris Vanden Berghe on 2004-10-18 00:45:58 +0200:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my gaim-encryption package.
Does you package differ substantially from Leo Costela's? [1] I
believe he was waiting to have a gaim-dev package before uploading it
to the archvie. In any case, y
begin quotation of Chris Vanden Berghe on 2004-10-18 00:45:58 +0200:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my gaim-encryption package.
Does you package differ substantially from Leo Costela's? [1] I
believe he was waiting to have a gaim-dev package before uploading it
to the archvie. In any case, y
10 matches
Mail list logo
