* Gisbert Friege , 2014-06-15, 12:58:
would you mind to give Dmaths another try?
I won't have time to look at it in the near future. Sorry!
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Hi Jakub,
>>I finally found time to actually install the software and play a bit
>>with it. I have to admit that I am deeply disappointed. I spent maybe
>>5 minutes and I saw:
>>- tooltips in French;
>>- tooltips in German;
>>- dialog boxes in French;
>>- *lots* of error messages in French;
>>- an
I finally found time to actually install the software and play a bit
with it. I have to admit that I am deeply disappointed. I spent maybe 5
minutes and I saw:
- tooltips in French;
- tooltips in German;
- dialog boxes in French;
- *lots* of error messages in French;
- an error box with no messa
Hi Jakub!
>>I have reviewed: no reference to them in macros files. I've
>>deleted them (in the script for repackaging).
>>Oh, I just realized that they were documentation files installed
>>into /usr/share/doc/. Well, in that case maybe it's worth keeping
>>them. (On the other hand they are a
* Innocent De Marchi , 2012-01-28, 17:33:
Are these files
mini_memo_dmaths_1.5.odt
memo_OOo_dmaths_1.5.odt
Lisez-moi.odt
install.odt
used for anything? If they are not, I'd appreciate if you could remove
them from .orig.tar, too. It'll make future reviews easier.
I have reviewed: no reference t
Hi Jakub,
>Thanks, I like the new .orig.tar more. I do wonder however, what
>happened to debian/dmaths.patch.
Good!
This patch changes seem unnecessary: If not running, nothing happens.
The elimination is in debian/changelog
>Are these files
>mini_memo_dmaths_1.5.odt
>memo_OOo_dmaths_1.5.odt
>Li
* Innocent De Marchi , 2012-01-24, 19:00:
Hi Jakob,
*cough* :)
I have decided to make profound changes in the compilation of the
package: I've removed some unnecessary things and updated debian/rules
to dh $@. In addition, I have automated the process of packaging of
sources.
Thus, the com
Hi Jakob,
I have decided to make profound changes in the compilation of the
package: I've removed some unnecessary things and updated debian/rules
to dh $@. In addition, I have automated the process of packaging of
sources.
Thus, the compilation is more clear and simple.
I hope that the package is
Hi Jakob,
I have realized some changes in the package. I have written a script for
the change of them sources.
Now the file control is the correct one. I hope that the bundle should
be correct
I have updated the package in debian.mentors
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmat
* Innocent De Marchi , 2012-01-17, 18:48:
s/rule/rules/ in debian/changelog.
I am sorry; I don't understand this phrase
There's a typo in Debian changelog: you should replace "rule" with
"rules".
I have a feeling that the new description is not (much) better than
the old one. Could you ple
Hi Daniel,
Thank you very much for your help. I have sent a message to the list
and I already have response
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2012/01/msg00052.html)
Regards!
I. De Marchi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
Hi Jakub,
>s/rule/rules/ in debian/changelog.
I am sorry; I don't understand this phrase
>I have a feeling that the new description is not (much) better
than the >old one. Could you please ask at
debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org >for a review?
OK. I
Jakub Wilk wrote:
>* Innocent De Marchi , 2012-01-15, 17:12:
>>Here you have the link again!
>>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.4.2+dfsg1-1.dsc
>
>s/rule/rules/ in debian/changelog.
>
>I have a feeling that the new description is not (much) better than the
>
>old one
13 matches
Mail list logo
