Re: RFS: daloradius (updated package)

2007-12-30 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 11:51 +0100, liran tal wrote: > > > It's just a bunch of .php and other related web application > > scripts which should simply be copied to /usr/share. > > > If only. These files are scripts that are to be run on an >

Re: RFS: daloradius (updated package)

2007-12-30 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, liran tal wrote: > Hey Richard, By the way you have sent HTML mail to the list which you should avoid. > but it does bother me on some level that someone whose suppose > to be a Mentor has taken such a lot of effort to discourage me from > building a package (whatever

Re: RFS: daloradius (updated package)

2007-12-29 Thread liran tal
Hey Richard, After my last email to Neil and the mailing list I have found the following link: http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft/html/index.html Which is actually the whole essence of this conversation, it would have been suffice to simply let me know about this webapps documentation w

Re: RFS: daloradius (updated package)

2007-12-27 Thread liran tal
Hey Neil, On Dec 27, 2007 11:01 AM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 09:10:14 +0100 > "liran tal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Uhm, it seems to me that the daloradius package is actually as easy > > as it can be. > > No, it is not and the fact that you have misse

Re: RFS: daloradius (updated package)

2007-12-27 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 09:10:14 +0100 "liran tal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i.e. the problem lies within the package itself because it is an > > intrinsically difficult package to build properly and you would be best > > advised finding something else when you are only just starting out as > > m

Re: RFS: daloradius (updated package)

2007-12-27 Thread liran tal
Hey Neil, On Dec 26, 2007 5:55 PM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i.e. the problem lies within the package itself because it is an > intrinsically difficult package to build properly and you would be best > advised finding something else when you are only just starting out as > main

Re: RFS: daloradius (updated package)

2007-12-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 17:47 +0200, liran tal wrote: > > I appreciate your feedback though for the lack of better words I can > summarize your reply as being a nicer way for saying "RTFM". No, more a case of "if you are unsure how the guidelines apply to this package, reconsider whether you are t

Re: RFS: daloradius (updated package)

2007-12-26 Thread liran tal
Hey Neil, I appreciate your feedback though for the lack of better words I can summarize your reply as being a nicer way for saying "RTFM". I do not wish to dwell into accusations and blames for documentations and such, if this is what you concluded from my previous email then you have spelled my

Re: RFS: daloradius (updated package)

2007-12-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 10:11 +0100, liran tal wrote: > I am doing everything in my power to get this package built right. > There is an enormous amount of pages about building debian packages > and none of them is consistent about how to build such package. > Unfortunately the New Maintainer's Guid

Re: RFS: daloradius (updated package)

2007-12-26 Thread liran tal
Hey Chris, On Dec 25, 2007 10:08 PM, Chris Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > liran tal wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.5-2 > > of my package "daloradius". > > This is (at least) the second time you have posted this package to the > list > and not corrected serious

Re: RFS: daloradius (updated package)

2007-12-25 Thread Chris Lamb
liran tal wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.5-2 > of my package "daloradius". This is (at least) the second time you have posted this package to the list and not corrected serious problems. As Romain Beauxis previously pointed out, this is rather annoying. I'm still spot