Re: RFS: chatplus

2007-03-18 Thread Thomas Jollans
On Sunday 18 March 2007 01:55, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > [snip] > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 05:15:18PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote: > > mentors.debian.org says that the package is lintian clean, my local > > lintian disagrees in points which are, IMHO, ignoreable (non-executable > > scripts in /usr/

Re: RFS: chatplus

2007-03-17 Thread Mohammed Sameer
[snip] On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 05:15:18PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote: > mentors.debian.org says that the package is lintian clean, my local lintian > disagrees in points which are, IMHO, ignoreable (non-executable scripts > in /usr/lib/chatplus which have wrappers in /usr/bin, one icon > in /us

Re: RFS: chatplus

2007-03-17 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 06:17:36PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote: > > to be precise, the source package is both lintian and linda clean, the > binaries are not. (Linda has no problem with non-executable scripts though) > Just FYI, but if you pass the .changes (instead of the .dsc) to lintian and l

Re: RFS: chatplus

2007-03-17 Thread Thomas Jollans
Hello again, I just cleaned debian/rules up a bit (removing useless comments and such). On Saturday 17 March 2007 17:15, Thomas Jollans wrote: > mentors.debian.org says that the package is lintian clean, my local lintian > disagrees in points which are, IMHO, ignoreable (non-executable scripts >