Re: RFS: blueman

2009-04-24 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Schramm schrieb: > Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> I think I would sponsor it, if you fix the following things: > > Sure. :-) > >> * Is there a need for a native package? I do not think so. > > No. I just thought that would be the right thing

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-04-24 Thread Christopher Schramm
Patrick Matthäi wrote: > I think I would sponsor it, if you fix the following things: Sure. :-) > * Is there a need for a native package? I do not think so. No. I just thought that would be the right thing to do, if there are no changes in source. Changed it. > * debian/prerm seems to be useles

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-04-24 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Christopher Schramm schrieb: > Jelle de Jong wrote: >> I agree this package is welcome in debian, somebody fancy to sponser? > > Since nobody was yet: Is there any problem with sponsoring the package? > I think I would sponsor it, if you fix the following things: * Is there a need for a native

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-03-07 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 06 March 2009 17:15:57 Christopher Schramm wrote: > Jelle de Jong wrote: > > I agree this package is welcome in debian, somebody fancy to sponser? > > Since nobody was yet: Is there any problem with sponsoring the package? Hi, It is not necessary for the package to have any technical or

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-03-06 Thread Christopher Schramm
Jelle de Jong wrote: I agree this package is welcome in debian, somebody fancy to sponser? Since nobody was yet: Is there any problem with sponsoring the package? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-03-02 Thread Jelle de Jong
Christopher Schramm wrote: > Jelle de Jong wrote: >> Would it not be better to improver bluez-gnome? or work with the >> bluez-gnome developers and choice one project to officially support. I >> think all the missing features that bluez-gnome does not bring will be on >> the developers todo list fo

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-03-02 Thread Christopher Schramm
Jelle de Jong wrote: > Would it not be better to improver bluez-gnome? or work with the > bluez-gnome developers and choice one project to officially support. I > think all the missing features that bluez-gnome does not bring will be on > the developers todo list for bluez-gnome. I am afraid for se

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-03-01 Thread Jelle de Jong
Luca Niccoli wrote: > 2009/3/1 Jelle de Jong : > >> Would it not be better to improver bluez-gnome? or work with the > > bluez-gnome is... for gnome. > > >> Nope there are no official command line tools for pairing, there is the >> simple-agent.py script in the testing directory of the git sour

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-03-01 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/3/1 Jelle de Jong : > Would it not be better to improver bluez-gnome? or work with the bluez-gnome is... for gnome. > Nope there are no official command line tools for pairing, there is the > simple-agent.py script in the testing directory of the git source, but it > is not supported and d

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-03-01 Thread Jelle de Jong
Christopher Schramm wrote: > Jelle de Jong wrote: >> This program looks nice, but I would like to see a very detailed >> explanation how it difference and what the relation is with: >> >> gpe-bluetooth >> bluetooth-applet (gnome-bluez) > > As mentioned (applies to bluez-gnome as well) - blueman br

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-03-01 Thread Christopher Schramm
Jelle de Jong wrote: > This program looks nice, but I would like to see a very detailed > explanation how it difference and what the relation is with: > > gpe-bluetooth > bluetooth-applet (gnome-bluez) As mentioned (applies to bluez-gnome as well) - blueman brings audio, input and dial-up support

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-03-01 Thread Jelle de Jong
Christopher Schramm wrote: > Neil Williams wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:31:42 +0100 >> Christopher Schramm wrote: >> >>> In my eyes blueman could be a real deal for lightweight desktops. >> gpe-bluetooth is designed for that kind of environment - how does this >> one differ? >> > > I'm not fa

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-03-01 Thread Christopher Schramm
Neil Williams wrote: > On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:31:42 +0100 > Christopher Schramm wrote: > >> In my eyes blueman could be a real deal for lightweight desktops. > > gpe-bluetooth is designed for that kind of environment - how does this > one differ? > I'm not familiar with gpe-bluetooth, but the

Re: RFS: blueman

2009-02-28 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:31:42 +0100 Christopher Schramm wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "blueman". > > It builds these binary packages: > blueman- A Graphical bluetooth manager Haven't we got quite a few of those already? The RFS (and ITP) should explain why you want to a