Dear Kilian
Finally, my package "acsccid 1.0.3-1" had been reviewed by Paul and I had
modified the package according to his comment.
You may be busy at this moment. Please take a look of my package as soon as
possible. I would be glad if you uploaded my package for me.
Regards
Godfrey
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Godfrey Chung wrote:
> I sent the e-mail to Secure Testing Team at home tonight. Hope that they can
> receive my e-mail. Thanks!
I've added your changes to SVN.
If yourself or anyone else wants to get involved in tracking security
issues in Debian, please take a
Dear Paul
I sent the e-mail to Secure Testing Team at home tonight. Hope that they can
receive my e-mail. Thanks!
Regards
Godfrey
Dear Paul
I cannot send the e-mail to the following address. It seems that our SMTP
server cannot do the identity verification. Can you help me to forward the
e-mail to Secure Testing Team?
---
Dear Secure Testing Team
I would like to add the following entries to the embedded-code-copies file.
acsccid is a fork of ccid and is based on ccid 1.3.11.
acsccid
- ccid 1.3.11 (fork)
ccid
- openct (modified-embed)
- towitoko (modified-embed)
Please correct me if the syntax is w
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Godfrey Chung wrote:
> I think the upstream will use it if openct exports this useful internal
> function from the library and the upstream author did not want to reinvent
> the wheel.
Please contact the openct upstream about that.
> acsccid is a fork of ccid but
Dear Paul
Why do you duplicate src/92_pcscd_acsccid.rules as
debian/libacsccid1.udev? I would suggest deleting
debian/libacsccid1.udev and just using the upstream file.
Done. I created a symbolic link to upstream file.
Why? Isn't the existing file installed by the upstream build system?
If
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Godfrey Chung wrote:
>> Why do you duplicate src/92_pcscd_acsccid.rules as
>> debian/libacsccid1.udev? I would suggest deleting
>> debian/libacsccid1.udev and just using the upstream file.
>
> Done. I created a symbolic link to upstream file.
Why? Isn't the existi
Dear Paul
Thank you for your review.
I filed #657110 on lintian to check for commented out Vcs-* fields
pointing at collab-maint (which is created by dh_make). Please
consider implementing a patch for it so that others don't make the
same mistake.
Done. I removed the comment.
You might want
Here is a review of your package:
I filed #657110 on lintian to check for commented out Vcs-* fields
pointing at collab-maint (which is created by dh_make). Please
consider implementing a patch for it so that others don't make the
same mistake.
You might want to run wrap-and-sort -s so diffs on d
10 matches
Mail list logo
