On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 12:08 +0800, Emfox Zhou wrote:
> in fact, the upstream has not officially released a tarball, i just
> used the CVS checkouted ones. you know, thing like Makefile.in
> couldn't be in CVS...
Ooops, I see.
> so, what should i do, is it ok to package the orig.tar.gz after
> ru
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005, Emfox Zhou wrote:
> in fact, the upstream has not officially released a tarball, i just
> used the CVS checkouted ones. you know, thing like Makefile.in
> couldn't be in CVS...
>
> so, what should i do, is it ok to package the orig.tar.gz after
> running autogen.sh, so that
> > Note that bootstrapping autotoolage at build-time is an official QA
> > nightmare [1] and if Dante would put
> >
> > 1. Don't believe me, look at Sam Hocevar's QA meeting talk slides:
> > http://sam.zoy.org/lectures/20050910-debian/img16.html
>
> Yes, this is what EmfoxZhou was doing before,
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:23 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Paul Wise wrote:
> > * Delete all the Makefile.in, config.h.in during debian/rules
> > clean, or make otherwise make it so that they are not in the
> > diff.gz
> Why's that? What's the alternative?
Mainly be
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:13:19PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:30:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:16 +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> >
> > > On http://www.debian.org/ there is a link called "Help Debian", to
> > > http://www.debian.org/devel/jo
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:13:19PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:30:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:16 +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> >
> > > On http://www.debian.org/ there is a link called "Help Debian", to
> > > http://www.debian.org/devel/jo
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:30:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:16 +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
>
> > On http://www.debian.org/ there is a link called "Help Debian", to
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ ("How You Can Help".
> >
> > Perhaps that page should incorporate yo
Hi,
Paul Wise wrote:
> * Delete all the Makefile.in, config.h.in during debian/rules
> clean, or make otherwise make it so that they are not in the
> diff.gz
Why's that? What's the alternative?
Note that bootstrapping autotoolage at build-time is an official QA
nightmare [1]
2005/9/29, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 17:19 +0800, Emfox Zhou wrote:
>
> > > * short and long description in debian/control needs improvement.
> > > A one line long description is not enough.
> > improved
>
> I suggest adjusting the grammar.
ahhh, sorry for
On 29-Sep-2005, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > * debian/manpage.1: that isn't a real manpage, delete it
> > > or write one
> >
> > deleted, i think a GUI apps needn't have a manpage
As has been pointed out, all programs in Debian need a manpage.
Even for a GUI program, a good manpage will sh
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:16 +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> On http://www.debian.org/ there is a link called "Help Debian", to
> http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ ("How You Can Help".
>
> Perhaps that page should incorporate your (very nice!) checklist.
> And/or maybe it should link to
> http://pe
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:05:47PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>
> H, I wonder where this should be spelled out so people get it right:
>
> 1. Get interested in a package
> 2. Find it is not in debian
> 3. Check if it can be packaged and if it is already being packaged
> 4
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 17:19 +0800, Emfox Zhou wrote:
> > * short and long description in debian/control needs improvement.
> > A one line long description is not enough.
> improved
I suggest adjusting the grammar.
FileZilla is a great file transfer client, like FlashFXP or FTPRush
2005/9/29, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Comments:
>
> * Delete all the Makefile.in, config.h.in during debian/rules
> clean, or make otherwise make it so that they are not in the
> diff.gz
done
> * Any reason for using experimental instead of unstable in the
>
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/12/msg00194.html
Yep. This too:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg7.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:34:34PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> * debian/copyright needs improvement - who holds copyright? what
> are the licencing terms written in the ustream README and source
> files? There is a good FAQ about writing these on the lists
> somewhere,
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 13:34 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> * Any reason for using experimental instead of unstable in the
> changelog?
Ooops, missed your comment about that.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Comments:
* Delete all the Makefile.in, config.h.in during debian/rules
clean, or make otherwise make it so that they are not in the
diff.gz
* Any reason for using experimental instead of unstable in the
changelog?
* debian/copyright needs improvement - wh
18 matches
Mail list logo
